Talk:Eastern imperial eagle

Birds Low‑importance

Eastern imperial eagle is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Northern mountains of Hungary?

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Since when Hungary has mountains? You must be kidding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Codrinb (talk • contribs) 04:26, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

There are in fact mountains in Hungary—see North Hungarian Mountains, which are part of the Carpathians. JeanLackE (talk) 21:17, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Length of this article

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm worried that this article is excessively long. The information in it is really good, and this is an excellent long-form description of this animal. But as it stands, this really fails as an encyclopedia entry: there are 62,000 characters and 10,000 words of prose, which at an average speed of 275 words per minute would take more than half an hour to finish. The article layout, also, is not conducive to finding synoptic and encyclopedia-like information—to find out anything, you really do have to read the entire thing. I suggest splitting off two shorter articles of about 10-15k characters each—probably one on dietary biology and one on breeding—and reformatting the topic headings so that there are many subsections under each of the current headings, and where each current heading starts with a summary. I'd really hate to delete information, but as this stands this is very clearly WP:TOOLONG. JeanLackE (talk) 21:17, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Reference formatting?

Latest comment: 11 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Recent editors to this article: @Historianengineer, Alihanuysal, Tonis124, Randy Kryn, and Robby: Is it typical in this field (ornithology/zoology/biology) to place article/chapter titles in italics and journal/book titles in roman type? I've made some corrections per MOS:MINORWORK and MOS:MAJORWORK, but I'm wondering if those are correct in this context. Edit: If not, there is a lot of work to been done. —DocWatson42 (talk) 07:59, 5 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

That would be quote marks for article titles and italics for the magazine the article is published in. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:12, 5 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

As far as i could know, according to APA in a citation, a journal name must be in italic, and an article name must be in roman type. -Historianengineer (talk) 17:20, 6 July 2025 (UTC)-Reply

Add topic