Talk:Duesberg hypothesis
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Hob Gadling in topic Citing Farber as a supporter
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Duesberg hypothesis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 6 months  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Citing Farber as a supporter
editConsidering her own article describes her as an impartial reporter, one or the other is due to be changed. She cannot simultaneously be a supporter of these theories and an impartial reporter about them. I see no evidence in the provided article that she personally supported these theories. Plinkis (talk) 07:02, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- The article Celia Farber says that she sees herself as impartial. But supporters of pseudosciences always see themselves that way, to justify False balance.
- But in this article, her name appears only in the lede and not in the body of the article. David Rasnick's name appears only in the lede and in sources. That is not how WP:LEDE works. The sentence in the lede calling them the main supporters should be deleted or added to the body (with a source). --Hob Gadling (talk) 07:33, 23 February 2026 (UTC)