| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Doctor Who series 3 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | Doctor Who series 3 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | Doctor Who series 3 is part of the List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Doctor Who (series 3)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 15:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- I'll start this in the next couple of days. auntieruth (talk) 15:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Critical Reception
editI feel like there isn't enough in the critical reception section. Could someone add more to it? LROSE (talk) 10:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- You're more than welcome to do so. -- AlexTW 10:23, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Doctor Who series 14 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
GA concerns
editI am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria due to uncited statements in the article, including entire paragraphs. Is anyone interestd in addressing this concern, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 13:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)