Talk:Diving team

	Underwater diving portal This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Underwater divingWikipedia:WikiProject Underwater divingTemplate:WikiProject Underwater divingUnderwater diving
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section sizes

Section size for Diving team (30 sections)
Section name	Byte count		Prose size (words)
Section name	Header	Total	Header	Total
(Top)	2,553	2,553	317	317
Professional diving	352	14,688	32	1,899
Core diving team	149	5,196	20	650
Working diver	655	655	80	80
Diving supervisor	1,289	1,289	140	140
Standby diver	1,044	1,044	134	134
Diver's tender	1,216	1,216	178	178
Diving medical practitioner	843	843	98	98
Additional members depending on circumstances	299	7,689	40	1,002
Compressor operator	512	512	62	62
Bellman	985	985	150	150
Launch and recovery system operator	279	279	31	31
Chamber operator	1,153	1,153	142	142
Gas man	494	494	64	64
Diving medical technician	1,345	1,345	185	185
Systems technician	658	658	92	92
Diving superintendent	660	660	87	87
Life-support technician	985	985	120	120
Life-support supervisor	319	319	29	29
ROV team	791	1,451	132	215
ROV pilot	332	332	45	45
ROV supervisor	328	328	38	38
Legal status	519	519	50	50
Recreational and technical diving	2,271	3,655	215	441
Team redundancy	1,384	1,384	226	226
Freediving	36	2,971	0	406
Buddy teams	1,212	1,212	148	148
Competition safety	650	1,723	88	258
Safety divers	1,073	1,073	170	170
References	7,973	7,973	0	0
Total	32,359	32,359	3,113	3,113

B-class review

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

B	The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as `{{cite web}}` is optional. Y Most statements referenced, those which are not are not controversial and are possible to reference, but would require access to the sources. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. YLooks reasonably compete. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. Y Structure is appropriate. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. Y Looks OK to me. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. Y Two appropriate images included. More would be nice, but not necessary. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible. Y Looks OK to me.

Passed as B-class. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 06:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic