Talk:Disenchanted (My Chemical Romance song)/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 21:01, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Fwedthebwead (talk · contribs) 15:29, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

I'll review this article. Fwedthebwead (talk)

This is my first time doing a GA review so I'm genuinely so sorry if it's not the best or I accidentally make a mistake.

I don't think you have a lot of problems, I checked through everything and it fits the criteria (mostly) to me. Mainly just some small stuff so I'll just list them out.

• The page numbers for Not the Life It Seems: The True Lives of My Chemical Romance are incorrect on the citations. It says the quote is from pg. 121-122 but in the book it's actually on pg. 147. The quote is also incorrect, as on pg. 147 he said "Revenge part two" instead of "Cheers part two".
  • Quote fixed; see below regarding page numbers.
• For the second citation, pg. 113-114, there's no mention of the song being played during soundchecks.
  • Just to clarify, the page numbers are different because the book edition I cited here is an eBook that has different page numbers. This is pages 120-121 on my end.

Here's some optional things

• In Live performances, you give the timeframe for Long Live the Black Parade tour and When We Were Young but not the Black Parade World Tour.
  • Fixed.
• I think Music and lyrics shouldn't be it's own heading, as the reviews from magazines could be put in Critical reception and the parts talking about the song's music and lyrics could be moved to Background. That's just what I've seen some other articles about songs do so you don't have to if you don't want to.
  • Music and lyrics/composition and lyrics is something that modern featured and good articles on songs do consistently. Placing the information in the background really doesn't make sense. This is in line with newer song articles, and the current standards, as well as most other MCR song articles.
• The part about the Patient being the album's central figure is already in the summary so it doesn't need to be repeated in Music and lyrics.
  • Removed.

Overall I think it's a good article it's just some small stuff that needs to be fixed or could be fixed. I've put it on hold for now until you fix the citations. If I've made a mistake don't hesitate to tell me! Fwedthebwead (talk)

• @Fwedthebwead: Thank you for taking the time to review this article! I've addressed the comments above. λ NegativeMP1 05:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

• @NegativeMP1:Thanks for fixing things and clarifying the page numbers. I'll update it as a GA now :) Fwedthebwead (talk) 16:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)