Talk:Diplonemid
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 18 April 2026
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| On 18 April 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Diplonemidae to Diplonemida. The result of the discussion was moved to Diplonemid. |
Requested move 18 April 2026
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 23:25, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
Diplonemidae → Diplonemida – Diplonemids are now more than one family, and this article talks about all diplonemids, not just Diplonemidae. See https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.200407, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2016.09.003 and https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12691. Jako96 (talk) 22:00, 18 April 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 17:56, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- I now think that this page should be moved to Diplonemid per Google Scholar. Jako96 (talk) 07:25, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.