Talk:Dejan Vuk Stanković/GA1
Latest comment: 5 days ago by Vacant0 in topic GA review
GA review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 15:46, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: JustARandomSquid (talk · contribs) 18:41, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
Let's do him, too. JustARandomSquid (talk) 18:41, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
Here's a checklist. JustARandomSquid (talk) 18:42, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, grammar, and understandability):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- a (prose, spelling, grammar, and understandability):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section):
b (inline citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- MoD picture again. The other picture is free and suitably captioned. The article is stable and has a references section. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:00, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
- Removed. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 14:58, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- Copyedit, as always. This one was a bit more involved, so ask anything. No NPOV issues, comprehensive, focused. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:06, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
- Here's a spot-check table. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:06, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
This table lists 9 random passages from throughout the article (20.0% of 45 total passages). These passages contain 10 inline citations (19.2% of 52 in the article). Generated with the Veracity user script. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:06, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
| Reference # | Letter | Source | Archive | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early life and career | |||||
| Dejan Vuk Stanković was born on 22 January 1973 in Belgrade, SR Serbia, SFR Yugoslavia. | |||||
| 1 | a | istinomer.rs | web.archive.org | ||
| 2 | blic.rs | web.archive.org | |||
| Minister of Education | |||||
| The composition of Đuro Macut's cabinet was announced on 14 April 2025, with Stanković mentioned as a candidate for the minister of education. | |||||
| 7 | n1info.rs | web.archive.org | |||
| Stanković was elected minister of education on 16 April, | |||||
| 3 | e | nin.rs | |||
| In May, Macut's government created a working group inside Stanković's ministry that would work on amending the Law on Higher Education. Besides Stanković, members of the working group also included Đokić, Béla Bálint, the minister of science, and Dejan Madić, the rector of University of Novi Sad. | |||||
| 16 | nova.rs | ||||
| In August, Stanković announced that the wages in education would be increased to meet the average monthly salary. | |||||
| 23 | danas.rs | Technically he didn't announce they would be increased, merely that that's what they hoped would happen, though. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:16, 5 July 2026 (UTC) | |||
| In October, Stanković announced that the new academic year would begin in November instead of October. | |||||
| 26 | rts.rs | Again, he technically only expects that, but good enough. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:16, 5 July 2026 (UTC) | |||
| In January 2026, the wages of education workers were increased by 5.1%. | |||||
| 29 | danas.rs | ||||
| Shortly before her term ended, Nešović suspended six professors from the Gymnasium. | |||||
| 36 | n1info.rs | ||||
| Personal life | |||||
| The report was dismissed in July. | |||||
| 42 | n1info.rs | ||||
- Very good on the spot-check. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:16, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
- I don't see any copyright issues other than the MoD image, no OR either. No problematic words to watch, layout ok, just lead left to check. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:16, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
- The lead is ok. I will point out that his profession is listed as philosopher in the infobox, which isn't particularly mentioned in the article. One other thing that I don't know which criterion to list under, is the sentence "In late March, the Faculty of Serbian Studies received a permit to operate." It's confusing because the Faculty is only trivially mentioned previously, so it feels like readers might forget. Perhaps emphasise its connections to him somehow. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:22, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
- Clarified that he studied philosophy. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- Other than that, done. Might as well wait for you to respond to the minor issues before I pass, there's no rush. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:22, 5 July 2026 (UTC)