Talk:Darling Cinder Pit
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Paul H. in topic Cinders vs Pumice vs Scoria
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| It is requested that an image or photograph of Darling Cinder Pit be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Arizona may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
Cinders vs Pumice vs Scoria
editWidely called a cinder pit, this source mentions only pumice production. Meanwhile this states "cinder" is a term for scoria, and that scoria should not be confused with pumice. So how should we technically describe the product(s) of this mine if "cinder" is colloquial? Input from a geologist would be helpful.----Pontificalibus 13:15, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
- At this time the revised Wikipedia page for Cinder looks like it is going to be merged with Scoria. As a geologist, "scoria aggregate" would be the term to technically describe the product of this mine. The latest and presumably last revision of the Wikipedia article for cinder is archived on the Wayback Machine. It provides a discussion of scoria versus cinder. Paul H. (talk) 21:17, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
