 | The content of NU 107 was merged into DWNU on 22 October 2025. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
- REDIRECT Talk:NU 107
Merger proposal
editThe result of the discussion was merge. 
Merge completed FaviFake (talk) 19:51, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Merge completed FaviFake (talk) 19:51, 22 October 2025 (UTC)The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I propose that NU 107 be merged into DWNU. I think that the content in the former article can easily be explained in the context of DWNU, and the latter article is of a reasonable size that the merging of the former will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Image2012 (talk) 02:02, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Support with a commensurate slimming down of the excessive detail in NU 107. We write about call sign–titled radio stations as continuous units without breaking up their histories by format. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 01:13, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- I’m guessing we need more people to vote on this? Image2012 (talk) 04:34, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Image2012 what we need is willing editors' time and effort! FaviFake (talk) 19:45, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Does anyone want to start the draft? Image2012 (talk) 09:27, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- I’m guessing we need more people to vote on this? Image2012 (talk) 04:34, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.