Talk:Cyberwarfare and Iran

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Adumbrativus in topic Requested move 13 April 2025

cyberwarfare in Germany

edit

Requested move 6 October 2019

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per lack of objection (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 22:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)Reply



Cyberwarfare in IranCyberwarfare and Iran – See article content with "Attacks by Iran" and "Attacks against Iran": Not just "in". X1\ (talk) 20:10, 6 October 2019 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 13 April 2025

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus (talk) 03:32, 22 April 2025 (UTC)Reply


Cyberwarfare and IranCyberwarfare by Iran – Per WP:CONSISTENT. Cyberwarfare by France, Cyberwarfare by Russia, Cyberwarfare by China. TurboSuperA+(connect) 17:48, 13 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. The consistency question goes quite the other way: it is Cyberwarfare and China now. It is also Cyberwarfare and the United States. This makes sense of course because Cyberwarfare involves offensive and defensive capabilities, and attribution capabilities, all of which are intertwined. In the Iranian case specifically, the page discusses both attacks on Iran and attacks by Iran. It would make little sense to split these off. JArthur1984 (talk) 22:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Also, I now see that although OP cited “Cyberwarfare by France”, that is actually only a redirect that goes to a subsection of the Cyberwarfare page.
So the WP:CONSISTENT question is even more favorable to keeping this page the same than I originally thought. JArthur1984 (talk) 02:13, 14 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
You're right. But should we then rename the Cyberwarfare by Russia article to Cyberwarfare and Russia? TurboSuperA+(connect) 05:29, 14 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
I think a Russia page move is a good idea. JArthur1984 (talk) 12:19, 14 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.