Talk:Cuprosklodowskite

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Edo-brandon in topic Analogue or no?

Analogue or no?

edit

This page says that it cuprosklodowskite was named as it was "mistaken[ly] belie[ved]" to be an analogue of sklodowskite, but the page for sklosdowskite states that it is in fact an analogue. The number of hydrates seems to be off by one. Neither page cites a source. Edo-brandon (talk) 03:19, 24 October 2025 (UTC)Reply