Talk:Criminal-justice financial obligations in the United States
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Criminal-justice financial obligations in the United States article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Criminal-justice financial obligations in the United States appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 April 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refs
edit- http://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/criminalfinancialobligations.asp
- https://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/wiener/programs/criminaljustice/research-publications/executive-session-on-community-corrections/publications/shackled-to-debt</ref>
- https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/centers/wiener/programs/pcj/files/shackled_to_debt.pdf
- https://nicic.gov/shackled-debt-criminal-justice-financial-obligations-and-barriers-re-entry-they-create
- https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/centers/wiener/programs/pcj/files/shackled_to_debt.pdf
- https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/249976.pdf
- https://appam.confex.com/appam/2016/webprogram/Session7450.html
- https://www.uj.ac.za/faculties/law/Documents/Criminal%20Just.pdf
- http://www.icjia.state.il.us/assets/articles/CJFO_Appendix_A.pdf
Wall of Text for Criminal Fines and Errors
editIt's about criminal fines.
Notice: "involvement" is used rather than "processed through the court system".
"Involvement with criminal court system" includes judges and lawyers and other employees. It would be difficult to decipher if you didn't know it was about criminal fines, why the editor is avoiding the word "process" as in due process.
He was trying to tie it into civil and administrative asset forfeiture. He really shouldn't be allowed to edit subjects he doesn't really know or perpetrate fraud.
Civil and Administrative Asset Forfeiture violates 5th Amendment Due Process. Seizing property without even charging the owner with a crime, thereby not even proving property was involved with a crime. This means the government officials skipped out on Due Process, which is unconstitutional and unlawful. The editor tried to tie Criminal Justice Justice Obligation to civil asset forfeiture to give the illusion it was somehow legal.
It was corrected in the past and reverted back to an almost indecipherable wall of text.
73.225.182.47 (talk) 00:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC) Tae Hyun Song
73.225.182.47 (talk) 00:50, 6 December 2021 (UTC) Tae Hyun Song
Civil/property forfeiture
editThe Wikipedia article on civil forfeiture cites the title concept as not being considered a CJFO, however this page includes it in a list of examples. Clarification and citation would help clear up this inconsistency. 71.29.195.178 (talk) 22:52, 4 April 2025 (UTC)