Talk:Council for Science and Technology

Importance

This ought to be considered as mid importance. But the article is very limited at the moment. I will do some work as time allows but I think it would benefit from:

• comparison to similar bodies in other countries such as the USA president advisory council
• a bit more explanation of the process of giving advice
• examples of particular reports which have had an impact e.g. recommending the Alan Turing Institute
• a list of those in the role of independent co-chair
• and of course a suitable image and sources external to the organisation.

Ca3tki (talk) 14:38, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

There is a suitable image on this page which says there is an open government licence. I would appreciate advice on whether that means the image could be used as it shows a meeting of CST including the PM sat between the co-chairs.

https://civilservice.blog.gov.uk/2022/08/15/harnessing-the-power-of-science-engineering-and-technology/

Ca3tki (talk) 11:59, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Quinquennial review

This process provides some useful information in 2021 but the 2003 publication was important and I see no archive copy anywhere online: https://depositedpapers.parliament.uk/depositedpaper/2244285/details Ca3tki (talk) 08:07, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Call off the search party. It is on the waybackmachine. Ca3tki (talk) 11:16, 5 February 2026 (UTC)