Talk:Constantine tramway/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Zach1055 (talk · contribs) 07:29, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: AlphaBetaGamma (talk · contribs) 04:25, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Prose (Criteria 1a, 1b, 4) clock

• A couple of unsourced statements. It is possible that more trams may be transferred in the future, due to the high demand of ridership on the Algiers tramway. is an example.
• FYI, I usually consider a statement unsourced if there are no inline citations at the end of a paragraph at least, WP:AGF that claims inside paragraphs are supported by citations in other parts of the paragraph.

Lead

• The lead should summarize all content in the article. Some sections aren't even mentioned once.
• Extremely confusing to say "airport" here, just link to Mohamed Boudiaf International Airport without pipelinking
• (Infobox) Spell out "overhead line" instead of OHLE

History

• You sure that there weren't any more wikipedia articles (not limited to the enwiki) to link to? Something like "Entreprise Métro d'Alger" seems to have frwiki articles.
• In addition, locals also opposed the construction of the tramway due to the disruption it would bring to the city's road network. - I'm assuming it is because the trams would simply block the cars' path and narrow the roads, right? Maybe clarify this part a bit more?

Sources clock

The citation numbers are based on (revisionid) version.

Copyvio (Criterion 2d)

FYI

Media clock

Captions (Criterion 6b) clock

• Please give a caption for the image in infobox I don't think the exact number of the rolling stock is necessary, but if you are willing to make that detailed, putting the name of the rolling stock works instead.

Suggestions (not needed for GA promotion)

• WP:LEADCITE - Because the lead usually repeats information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material. Although the presence of citations in the lead is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article, there is no exception to citation requirements specific to leads.

• @AlphaBetaGamma: Are you interested in completing this review? Z1720 (talk) 01:49, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

  Sorry, I can confirm that I'm no longer able to do much on enwiki, and if possible, could you take this review over? AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 00:26, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

  Are you interested in taking over this review, Z1720? If not, it might be worth sending it back to the queue ... though I am unexperienced and uncomfortable with doing so on my own. Urve (talk) 18:23, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

  @AlphaBetaGamma and Urve: No, I am not. Perhaps another reviewer can be requested, or this can be closed as "failed" so it can be renominated. Z1720 (talk) 22:42, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

  Hello, review nominator here. If nobody here wants to continue/take over the review, how can I go about requesting another reviewer? Zach1055 (talk) 05:25, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

• @Zach1055: I changed the review's status to "ask a second opinion". I might post a new thread at WT:GA listing all the articles that need another reviewer soon, as there are a couple that need some nudging. Z1720 (talk) 17:26, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

  OK, understood. Zach1055 (talk) 17:52, 9 May 2026 (UTC)