Talk:Consequence (website)

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

On 26 April 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Consequence (publication) to Consequence (website). The result of the discussion was moved.

Significance/Importance

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I preface this by saying I'm not affiliated with the company at all. I also received clearance from Brandon before creating this article. I would also note that the company in reference is one of the more notable music publications online and certainly receives more traffic than several other similar websites with Wikipedia pages. .

Also, I think you have to be somewhat notable if you can claim to have had "content linked to by ESPN.com, Rolling Stone, New York Magazine, BBC.co.uk, USA Today, Spin, Filter Magazine, Chicago-Sun Times, The New Yorker, The Huffington Post, Stereogum.com, Pitchfork.com, BrooklynVegan.com, MTV.com, Time Out Chicago, Comedy Central Insider, LA Weekly, Knoxville News Sentinel, and countless other popular media outlets." And I don't they they are exaggerating those claims either .

Plus, looking at their staff page, writers have also worked for the likes of Paste, Pitchfork, Spin, Magnet Magazine, and CBS among others . Chuckd1584 (talk) 11:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

OK, I won't delete it, but you need to integrate that stuff into the article. It's no use just having it here. Stifle (talk) 11:38, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ok, how would you recommend doing so? Obviously, I'd like to keep it as unbiased and objective as possible, but I'm not sure how you go about saying "Hey, they get great traffic and have lots of citations on their resumé." Any help would be appreciated. Chuckd1584 (talk) 14:10, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 26 April 2026

Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 01:10, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Consequence (publication) → Consequence (website) – I see no reason for labeling it as "publication", since it is an online music magazine and website. Like Pitchfork, I don't think Consequence should be explicitly labeled as "magazine" though. Camilasdandelions (✉️) 10:17, 26 April 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 06:55, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic