Talk:Congressional Award

Image copyright problem with Image:D of e.jpg

The image Image:D of e.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

International Award Association

Is this still part of the International Award Association? ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 16:26, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

• no. they left it about 5 or so years ago. Another group in the US was formed to be the US version of the IA. This stuff should be edited out. No idea why they left or exactly when. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.188.24.27 (talk) 17:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Differing views

Does this really apply to this article? They are non-partisan and seem to push no agenda. What other significant viewpoints are there? Is there anyone out there who knows about the Congressional Award? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.92.170.9 (talk) 14:41, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Congressional Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111160518/http://congressionalaward.org/events/horizon.php to http://congressionalaward.org/events/horizon.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111160518/http://congressionalaward.org/events/horizon.php to http://congressionalaward.org/events/horizon.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Congressional Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130814035052/http://www.congressionalaward.org/about/history.php to http://www.congressionalaward.org/about/history.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120513100127/http://www.congressionalaward.org/donatenow.php to http://www.congressionalaward.org/donatenow.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111206045005/http://www.congressionalaward.org/events/golf.php to http://www.congressionalaward.org/events/golf.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111206044722/http://www.congressionalaward.org/events/poker.php to http://www.congressionalaward.org/events/poker.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111205141317/http://www.congressionalaward.org/events/gold.php to http://www.congressionalaward.org/events/gold.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120802164739/http://www.congressionalaward.org/about/board.php to http://www.congressionalaward.org/about/board.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111108023909/http://www.congressionalaward.org/contact.php to http://www.congressionalaward.org/contact.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Removal of templates

@Ameliawikis @Favoid I saw that you were the ones to add these templates, albeit years and years ago. Has the article changed substantially enough to remove them? Personally, I believe the primary source template still applies, but I haven't gone over them thoroughly enough to say so definitively. (Also pinging @LuckyDuckyIsOk) Realtent (talk) 02:20, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

From my scan of it, it looked right, and it seemed to have the relevant information, but I can be wrong, and I apologize if I did. Please double check, but the article looked updated and seemed to cover the issues that was addressed. LuckyDuckyIsOk (talk) 02:30, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

No, you're totally fine! At least in my experience, it's good to have at least some discussion before removing templates. I'm going over the article more thoroughly now, and will get back to you soon (though I might take a break for a meal) Realtent (talk) 02:34, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Realtent (talk) 02:34, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Ok yeah sounds good. LuckyDuckyIsOk (talk) 02:34, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

I've reviewed it a bit more, and can agree that the promo and multiple views issues are mostly resolved. I want to keep the primary sources template as that's what most of the sources are though. Realtent (talk) 03:07, 15 May 2026 (UTC)