Talk:Confessions II – The Film

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Madonna Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Madonna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Madonna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MadonnaWikipedia:WikiProject MadonnaTemplate:WikiProject MadonnaMadonna
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

Latest comment: 5 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that one journalist suggested that Confessions II – The Film would be remembered as "the vagina laser video"? Source: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2026/jun/09/madonna-new-video-confessions-ii-the-film, https://theweek.com/culture-life/music/madonna-confessions-film
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/The World Is to Dig
- Comment: Driveby nom.

Created by King10 (talk) and Livelikemusic (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 408 past nominations.

Laun chba ller 20:48, 9 June 2026 (UTC).Reply

"Vagina laser video"

Latest comment: 11 hours ago3 comments2 people in discussion

@King10:, you removed the "vagina laser video" from the article citing "this is Wikipedia, not a place for random jokes", but this isn't one, and the fact that The Week reported on The Guardian saying it would make that fact alone WP:DUE either way.--Laun chba ller 00:54, 13 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Launchballer: my point is that the information you're putting is wrong. It's not true that "film became known as the vagina laser video". That would suggest it's a common name, used by many people, but that's not the case. It's a joke written by one journalist, Zoe Williams from The Guardian. The Week article that you're mentioning literally says that it's a name given by Williams in The Guardian, so that's basically still a joke from one person. If we google "vagina laser", we can see many mentions of lasers from vagina, but not the nickname "vagina laser video". Instead of stating the film is known by this name, we should mention that one person called it like that. However, I don't see where such information should be put - it's not a part of review, so it doesn't belong to critical response. Maybe the good idea would be to add some section about analysis and interpretations - this name from Zoe Williams would fit there. King10 (talk) 09:45, 14 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I suggest broadening "Critical response" to simply "Response".--Laun chba ller 13:27, 14 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Add topic