Talk:Color Fantasy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

On 29 May 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from MS Color Fantasy to Color Fantasy. The result of the discussion was moved.

Size

Latest comment: 20 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This post was moved from my talk page. bbx 14:17, 1 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

You have corrected the article about M/S Color Fantasy from : M/S Color Fantasy is the world’s largest cruise ship with a car deck. To: M/S Color Fantasy is one of the largest cruiseferries in the world. I wonder why? The ship is the largest ferry operating in the world, so why not have the correct information in the article? M/S Color Fantasy is the largest cruiseferry in the world today. Should not the article reflect this? Thanks for your time. Unsigned comment by User:86.135.126.206

True, we should state that Color Fantasy infact is the largest cruiseferry in the world. The purpose of my edit was to change the description of the ship to a cruiseferry instead of "cruise ship with a car deck". Thank you for your time. bbx 14:25, 1 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Specification

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Since the prose tag I placed in September 2011 was removed, I will state my reasoning for putting the tag to the "Specification" chapter. The technical details should be listed in the infobox and described in the article body — that's what the infobox is for. The data can also easily be presented in a prose form. That's how it is done in most ship articles. Tupsumato (talk) 09:11, 29 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 29 May 2026

Latest comment: 5 hours ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 22:55, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

– Per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NCSHIPS specifically: an article about a ship not known to have a prefix should use only the ship's name, if that name is unambiguous. Owner Color Line refers to them without the prefixes. Secondary cites. e.g. Businessland, Maritime Executive, Shipping News also describe without prefixes. Emethigg (talk) 23:30, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Move all - Per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NCSHIPS. From some sampling for each of these, there is very little usage of prefixes. - Davidships (talk) 21:14, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic