Talk:Click chemistry

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Smokefoot in topic Layman explanation

Linus Pauling?

edit

I looked at the PNAS paper referenced in the first line of the page as of today: "Click chemistry is a chemical philosophy first recognized by Linus Pauling in 1933." I did not find any evidence to support Pauling's involvement in developing the reaction philosophy now known as click chemistry; the referenced paper appears to address molecular structures of methyl azide and carbon suboxide. The textual reference to Pauling and PNAS citation were deleted by 108.56.185.171 earlier today on the same grounds, but have been reinstated with no explanation by 159.14.241.230. I have removed the problematic edit until firmer evidence is added. Please do not engage in edit warring.

If anyone is aware of Pauling's actual involvement in the development of click chemistry, please add that information.Kmva (talk) 21:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sulfur(VI) Fluoride Exchange

edit

A new kind of click reaction has been discovered between thionyl tetrafluoride and primary amines.[1] SOF4 is not currently commercially available and there are no applications as of yet but is it worth mentioning in this page? I've already made a little section in the thionyl tetrafluoride page. Gsurfer04 (talk) 12:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Click chemistry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Layman explanation

edit

As a non-chemist, I find the current click chemistry article aimed at far too high a technical level to understand why it is so useful and important that it won the 2022 Nobel Prize; it could use a section popularizing it. Some popular writeups to take inspiration from: https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/2022-nobel-prize-chemistry https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2022/10/popular-chemistryprize2022.pdf https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/05/science/nobel-prize-chemistry-winner.html --Gwern (contribs) 20:07 5 October 2022 (GMT)

In the history section, the sentence "Few major classes of structurally complex organic compounds have more than six C-C bonds (except aryl derivatives)" does not make sense to me as a non-chemist. It's also probably too technical for the history section. The terms must have some specific meanings that aren't obvious to a layperson, because I read that and say it must not be true. The molecule shown at the top of the organic chemistry page appears to have 20 C-C bonds, for example. The rest of that paragraph is too technical as well.  Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-73354-0 (talk) 23:09, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

As the most recent heavy editor, Iplead guilty. In my defense, until those recent edits, the article also did not make sense even to chemists (to some extent).
One problem is that the concepts are indeed both quite advanced and quite vaguely defined at the same time. So you are asking a very difficult question, equivalent to jumping into some fairly advanced math article and wanting to simplify it. There is however one highly popular reaction involving organic azides and certain alkynes which can be depicted to show the clicking. But even that requires some decent knowledge of organic chemistry and an understanding of why people want to link things together. --Smokefoot (talk) 01:22, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
I just reread the intro. It would be difficult, at least for me, to pitch this description any more simply. Click chem is an advanced concept. --Smokefoot (talk) 04:16, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Some reviews

edit

The article seems dated and specialized (see preceding comment). Here are some overviews from Chemical Reviews post 2020: >2020

--Smokefoot (talk) 14:15, 2 November 2025 (UTC)Reply