For months, info on Chig playing Old School RuneScape was freely available on this page and caused no controversy, until suddenly an editor who just so happened to be a Washington Commanders fan decided it was "irrelevant" and removed it as part of an unnecessary and unwanted "cleanup" of this page after he signed with the editor's favorite team. There was no reason to do this beyond being pedantic and stubbornly wanting to control the flow of information for the sake of controlling it.
As such, I will continue to re-add it until such a time as a consensus is reached not to form it. Random editors with an obvious conflict of interest shouldn't get to purge articles because they feel like it. SVeach94 (talk) 01:18, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
- Actually, on second thought, let's not. This was the last straw for me, I'm done fighting with editors over their hostility towards anyone who doesn't used outdated ideas of what qualifies as "notable". Goodbye, Wikipedia. SVeach94 (talk) 01:21, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
- Thank you for self-reverting and not getting into an edit war. Assadzadeh (talk) 01:50, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
- @SVeach94: I can understand the frustration. I believe the detail could be added and a citation needed flag could be alongside it to note a better source is needed. I'll add the additional comment that I believe hobbies are relevant to a biographical article. We just need reporters to interview him on the topic for it to be sourceable. AJ Dillon is a big farming simulator streamer, but his article doesn't have it. Abraham Lincoln read a lot, and his article notes it. Why can't video gaming be a part of someone's biographical story? --Engineerchange (talk) 02:02, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
