Talk:Chauchilla Cemetery

A fact from Chauchilla Cemetery appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 October 2009. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that bodies (pictured) buried in Chauchilla Cemetery still retain skins and hair?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2009/October.

Wikipedia

Peru Low‑importance

This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Peru To-do:

Assess and prioritise articles (log)
Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate
Create:
Expand: new articles; top importance articles
FAC / FLC: Peru national football team
GAN:
Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture
Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes
Translate: National University of San Marcos
Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive
Wikify: articles needing attention

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cemeteries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

600 years?

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The cemetary was established around 200 ad, and has not been used since 9th? That is either "ca. 700 years" or "almost 700 years," if I am not mistaken. Can someone explain the reasoning or create some more accurate wording? SADADS (talk) 14:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

The 9th century began in the year 800 A.D. (or more precisely, 801, as we were told at the turn of the millenium). Thus (800 - 200) = 600. Boneyard90 (talk) 09:45, 10 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Is this article too scary?

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Yikes! I saw it on the main page.--Appletartgame (talk) 16:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chauchilla Cemetery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091216072049/http://www.periododeaventura.com:80/tours/cahuachi.html to http://www.periododeaventura.com/tours/cahuachi.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nazca Mummies: Hoax?

Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

A google search of "Nazca Mummies" gives this Article as 1st result. Came here in response to sketchy online article claiming some new kind of scientific research indicates that these mummies are considered more legitimate. Aliens, 3-fingers, pending DNA analysis, etc... Came to Wikipedia hoping to either bunk or debunk, as I've never heard of them before. Could this Article either mention, or redirect to a trusted source that can quickly allow the Reader to determine hoax or no hoax, vs. having to wade through metric tons of online electronic garbage?

2603:8081:3A00:30DF:D0E3:C3F1:D749:D50F (talk) 07:13, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I was here three weeks ago. It is real. It is just the way they buried their people. Nothing strange or alien going on. Just pre-Nazca people. MMcGill1775 (talk) 21:35, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Add topic