Talk:Characters of Dragon Age: Inquisition

Hawke's Warden ally

As different as the characters themselves are, I'm thinking about merging Alistair, Loghain, and Stroud under one section. They share pretty much the same role in the plot, and do pretty much the same things. Alistair's a bit different, he can appear as king, but frankly I don't think that version of him is worth more than a brief note, if that, appearing as an optional semi-cameo in Redcliffe and after that only being on the War Table. It helps that he already has his own article to cover his character in more detail. – The Millionth One (talk) (contribs) 02:06, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 10 October 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 02:14, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

---

Characters of Dragon Age: Inquisition → List of Dragon Age: Inquisition characters – This is a list. Standardizing names of character lists in . See also relevant WP:VT discussion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC) — Relisting.  veko. (user | talk | contribs) [he/him] 14:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Video games has been notified of this discussion. veko. (user | talk | contribs) [he/him] 14:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Oppose The article is more detailed than the average list article; it doesn't just list characters but also their development and reception. "Characters of X" is a common title convention for such articles. Rosaece ♡ talk ♡ contribs 15:09, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

@Rosaece See List of Dragon Age: Origins characters, List of Dragon Age II characters, etc. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

• Support Mostly a list, even if it does have some prose sections. This naming scheme is intended for articles that are mostly prose. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose per Rosaece and points made at similar RMs for video game series. This article has substantial background information and even the most list-like section contains far more prose than a typical list. It does not align with the typical types and structures described at Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists#General formats of list articles. There is no strict criteria for determining the boundary between a list and an article but this looks like an article and the proposed title is not an improvement. The two other RMs cited had very little participation–one had zero respondents and was as an uncontested request with minimal participation and the other had only one respondent. Those moves do not reflect a broad consensus. The relevant WP:VT discussion at most might reflect WP:LOCALCONSENSUS but in reading the discussion it is clear there is substantial disagreement there about this suite of recent move proposals. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫‍(talk) 04:08, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose per other discussions. These proposals are based on a contested assumption, but these articles can be articles rather than just lists. SnowFire (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.