Talk:Camelford (constituency)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

1621-1622: Sir Henry Carey

edit

The WP article on Henry Carey, 2nd Earl of Monmouth makes no mention of him sitting in Parliament. Vernon White . . . Talk 22:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

1624-1625: Francis Cottington

edit

1647: Gregory Clement

edit

The WP article on Gregory Clement has him elected for Fowey in 1648 but does not mention Camelford. Vernon White . . . Talk 22:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

1679: William Harbord

edit

The WP article on William Harbord (politician) has him elected for Launceston but does not mention Camelford. Vernon White . . . Talk 22:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

1689: Ambrose Manaton

edit

The WP article on Ambrose Manaton has him elected for Launceston but does not mention Camelford. Vernon White . . . Talk 23:00, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

1695: Robert Molesworth

edit

The WP article on Robert Molesworth, 1st Viscount Molesworth (1656 – 1725), makes no mention of him sitting in Parliament. Vernon White . . . Talk 23:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Camelford (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply