Talk:Caithness Energy

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Feedback from New Page Review process

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!.

North8000 (talk) 22:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Excessive citations ?

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Do not understand why seven (7) citations are needed to prove association between principal and their project. One good proof is sufficient. Caithness Long Island Energy Center and Shepherds Flat Wind Farm each have 7 cite proofs. Why?

If the intent is to show controversies associated with Caithness Energy, then make that point into a subject item.TomStonehunter (talk) 19:56, 6 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

See WP:OVERKILL for reference. TomStonehunter (talk) 16:06, 7 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Add topic