Talk:Business.com

Latest comment: 11 months ago by GoldRomean in topic Business.com page updates for accuracy
edit

We need a better logo. If a company rep is watching, feel free to replace the existing logo. Click on it, then upload a new file. Thanks. Jehochman Hablar 16:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

1996 or 1997

edit

Can't get clarity on whether the $150000 domain price was set in 1996 or 1997. Trusting 1997 for now based on generally legitimacy of dated News.com article. -Gych (talk) 06:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Business.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Business.com page updates for accuracy

edit
  • What I think should be changed (include citations):

I apologize in advance for not including citations correctly. Despite my best efforts, I do not understand how to use that functionality. These are the areas I think should be changed: 1. The logo 2. The introductory text 3. History 4. Products

  • Why it should be changed:

1. It is outdated. 2. It no longer accurately describes business.com and does not account for the 2020 acquisition by Centerfield. Business.com no longer has directory listings and generally doesn't cover industry news. It features educational articles on business concepts, business how-to guides, and product and service recommendations for small businesses. There are nearly 2,000 pieces of content, not 15,000. Business.com operates as part of Centerfield. 3. The history ends in 2018 and does not account for the sale of business.com to Centerfield in 2020. Centerfield acquired Business.com, its sister sites Business News Daily and Buyer Zone, and another property, Savings.com, to add to its portfolio of owned-and-operated digital brands. 4. The customers listed are no longer accurate. As seen on the business.com website, current customers include Intuit, Clover, Gusto, Toast, Square, HubSpot, and Zoom. The LENS product no longer exists. Business.com launched a new product in 2025: business.com+, a free membership program that connects business owners with business service advisors. Members have access to special pricing for business software and tools from business.com's advertising partners.

  • References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

Centerfield acquisition[1] Centerfield acquisition[2] Centerfield owns and operates business.com[3] Business.com+ description[4] Business.com description [5]


90210grl (talk) 17:27, 1 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Not done for now: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. GoldRomean (talk) 03:45, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply