Talk:Borophene

One source

All five citations of this article essentially point to the same source, a single research article in Nature Communications. This is a weak basis for such a Wikipedia article, the existence of borophene has still to be confirmed. A list of five different references, all pointing to the same source, is a very questionable practice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.175.202.2 (talk • contribs) 10:26, 8 May 2014‎ (UTC)

Thanks for noticing. A piece on a variant of borophene came out today. I'll add to the article. Same team, though. Lfstevens (talk) 18:31, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

B(36)

B₃₆ should have an article. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 12:31, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Semiconducting form could be used for transistors

says New semiconducting borophene paves the way for the lightest high-performance transistor - Rod57 (talk) 21:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Figure 1?

It seems like an edit was made to hide the Figure 1 of this article. It is referred to in the text and seems like something that would be important to have, but there appears to be a broken citation template added to it or something? I don't know how to restore it while keeping the citation. EuCl3 (talk) 23:26, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

I agree that Figure 1 should be restored while keeping the citation, so I fixed the minor syntax error. Thank you, EuCl3! --DavidCary (talk) 21:03, 17 June 2026 (UTC)