Talk:Blue Beetle (film)/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Yovt (talk · contribs) 13:58, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) 13:57, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi! I will be reviewing this article, expect the initial remarks soon! Vestrian24Bio 13:57, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

@Vestrian24Bio any updates on this review? It's been over a month since comments have been made here. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 21:08, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Extremely sorry, been a bit busy month, but I have begun reviewing this article and will finish by next week. Vestrian24Bio 12:37, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Will finish it in the coming week. Vestrian24Bio 10:21, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Any progress on this? Rusted AutoParts 05:14, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

If not, then I think it would be best not to move forward with one at this time. I do plan on mulling through interview material to expand the article's scope and do some more copyediting in the future. Considering this was nominated almost a year ago, I think the article could benefit from some work and being re-nominated for review after that point. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 05:22, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

I will add that I know these reviews can be a bit overwhelming and tedious, and I have learned the hard way from some in the past. However, most GAs should not be nominated or up for review unless each party involved is 100% committed to the work, considering we all have a shared goal of improving the encyclopedia. No shade to anyone, though, of course. We all have other commitments come up. Cheers, — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 05:25, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

@Trailblazer101: should I close the review now..? Vestrian24Bio 05:29, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

I would say so, as with another editor expressing concern about the article's eligibility due to the length between nomination and time review was started, the nominator themselves not editing on the article or appearing here to query about updates themselves, and on account you do seem a bit preoccupied at present time, it's best to suspend the review. Rusted AutoParts 06:04, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

I'll close it now; if any assistance/review is needed in future, let me know.. Vestrian24Bio 06:05, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Final review

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.