Talk:Bell Media

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Isaacl in topic ownership contradiction

Ctv Considers "A" a secondary network

edit

Ctv Considers "A" a secondary network —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.42.232 (talk) 19:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

violation of Wikipedia terms of use

edit

The subject of a Wikipedia article is not permitted to write or edit any of the text in his or her own article.

This entry was written by CTV Globe Media and its employees. Mardiste (talk) 13:00, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Should Kevin Crull have his own Wikipedia page, or should he be discussed here?

edit

For the second time in two years, the Canadian media is reporting that Bell Media Chairman Kevin Crull allegedly tried to directly interfere with the content of news reporting. [1] This controversy is national news, and clearly worthy of a mention on Wikipedia, but I do not know whether the appropriate place to make note of the issue is on this page, on a separate page about the issue, or on a separate page about Mr. Crull. As an outspoken public figure, perhaps he should have his own page. On the other hand, his statements and actions are only newsworthy because of his association with the company. Does anyone have any thoughts on the appropriate place for this? NikolaiSmith (talk) 03:06, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Good question and I support the idea. --Sd-100 (talk) 20:36, 30 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Which option do you support? A mention on this page, a separate page on the issue, or a separate page for the individual? Personally, I think that it could just go on this page. NikolaiSmith (talk) 19:48, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

A mention on this page. However if there more additionnal infos who are added, then we could post a separate page on the issue. --Sd-100 (talk) 11:54, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Article needs updating

edit

According to the The Woodbridge Company wikipedia article, Thomson sold all shares in this company in 2010. Weewaterasia (talk) 02:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bell Media. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on CTVglobemedia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:51, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bell Media. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on CTVglobemedia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 28 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Bell Media. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

research

edit

I am trying to find a tape from the 1980's. One was Real to Reel and the other was Scarborough Today. Both were on Scarborough TV. It could have been Shaw or Rodgers or other.Can you help  Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.70.69.107 (talk) 09:57, 23 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

History section removed

edit

Did someone remove the history section? Because I'm concerned, and it's important to a company's history. 45.225.71.210 (talk) 17:08, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

ownership contradiction

edit

It seems that there is some conflicting information in this article and others related, and authoritative sources regarding the owership.

In the article, it is mentioned that the parent company is BCE Inc, while both the CRTC [1] and Quebec's Enterprise Registrar [2], which are authoritative sources, show it as a fully owned subsidiary of Bell Canada.

What should be done for this?


Wolfy13399 (talk) 21:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Going back to 2012 using the Internet Archive, the CRTC states the same as present day, Bell Media is 100% owned by Bell Canada
https://web.archive.org/web/20121006001437/http://www.crtc.gc.ca/ownership/eng/cht143k.pdf Wolfy13399 (talk) 22:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
The reasons for the details of corporate structure can vary. A network of ownership shares held by intermediate subsidiaries that all end up 100% owned by a parent company is generally due to ways that corporate mergers or reorganizations were structured, for tax reasons, or other legal obligations. BCE was originally more of a holding company, but became more directly involved in operating its child companies. As shown in its CRTC ownership structure chart and its 2024 annual report, it has two main divisions: one for its communications operations, and one for its media operations. As the actual operating parent company for Bell Media is BCE, and not the organization publicly known as Bell Canada, I feel it's reasonable to describe it as such in the article. In effect, the paper holding company "Bell Canada" is just named that for historical legal reasons, and isn't the same as the current Bell Canada organization. isaacl (talk) 00:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)Reply