Talk:Bechbretha

Latest comment: 1 year ago by NightWolf1223 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by NightWolf1223 talk 14:54, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

  • Source: Only facts used in this hook are the translations of the various titles, most which can be found in helpful lists from Charlene Eska in Cáin Lánamna and Lost and Found. For Mellbretha as "Sport judgements", see here and for Recholl Breth as "shroud of judgements" see here
Each article was created between 5 and 11 February (with the exception of Bechbretha, converted from a redirect on 5 February). The shortest article is Muirbretha, at ~2300 characters. The hook is over 350 characters, but that's probably as short as it could be.
Created / converted from a redirect by Tenpop421 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 15. Nominator has 9 past nominations.

Tenpop421 (talk) 19:32, 11 February 2025 (UTC).Reply

  • @Tenpop421: I've reviewed the articles now, and there's just a few where I added clairification tags, which I epxect will be quick fixes for you. As above, I think the hook could shorten, so I'll let you play around with that. Many thanks for such an interesting group of articles. Lajmmoore (talk) 15:07, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • @Lajmmoore: Thank you for single-handedly reviewing these articles, no small task! I hope I have fixed the issues brought up in the clarification tags, and I'll hopefully get to the talk page suggestions before these articles run on the main page. As to the hook, does the following scan for you:
ALT0a ... that among the sources for early Irish law are judgments on bees, on the sea, on sports, on blood-lying, and on inadvertence; judgements which are wrong, false, shrouded, and from a god; the paths to judgement and to distraint; the shaving of the court, the branched purchase, a glossary, and a lot of lists of seven?
Best, Tenpop421 (talk)
  • Reviewing - I set up a table, but have not included 'eligibility other', 'policy other', or the picture ones from it. The hook probably requires discussion separate to reviewing each article, so I just kept whether it was cited in the table.
DYK checklist
ArticleNewnessLengthSourced?Neutral?Plagiarism freeHook citedQPQCommentsSign
BechbrethayyyyyyycheckYLajmmoore (talk) 19:55, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
MuirbrethayyyyyyycheckYLajmmoore (talk) 20:00, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
MellbrethayyyyyyycheckYLajmmoore (talk) 20:09, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Bretha CróligeyyyyyyycheckYLajmmoore (talk) 20:16, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Bretha ÉtgidyyyyyyycheckYLajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
AnfuigellyyyyyyycheckYLajmmoore (talk) 20:45, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Gúbretha CaratniadyyyyyyycheckYLajmmoore (talk) 20:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Bretha Déin ChéchtyyyyyyycheckYLajmmoore (talk) 13:13, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Recholl BrethyyyyyyycheckY there's two [when?] tags that need addressing Lajmmoore (talk) 13:19, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Cóic Conara FugillyyyyyyycheckY but please fix [clarification needed] tag for 'better' Lajmmoore (talk) 13:27, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Cethairṡlicht AthgabálaeyyyyyyycheckY please address [when?] and [clarification needed] tags Lajmmoore (talk) 13:37, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Berrad AirechtayyyyyyycheckYLajmmoore (talk) 13:52, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Críth GablachyyyyyyycheckYLajmmoore (talk) 14:51, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
O'Davoren's GlossaryyyyyyyycheckY but one tag to addressLajmmoore (talk) 14:59, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
SechtaeyyyyyyycheckYLajmmoore (talk) 15:04, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'll start reviewing, but please do join in Lajmmoore (talk) 19:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Tenpop421: Just as an aside, one of the QPQs used (Template:Did you know nominations/Vittae) may need replacing, as per WP:QPQ, DYK reviews that are merely quickfails are usually not counted as QPQs for DYK purposes. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:12, 18 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Replaced with "Babak Ganjei". Tenpop421 (talk) 00:16, 18 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Narutolovehinata5 - I didn't know that was a rule. Confirming new QPQ Lajmmoore (talk) 13:28, 21 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
For what it's worth, that guideline is gone now thanks to the WT:DYK discussion inspired by this nom. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 15:29, 21 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Historiography

edit

No essential for the DYK, but I wondered if there was any more historiographic content that could be added here? The interpretations in the Muirbretha really add knowledge for the reader. Lajmmoore (talk) 20:03, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply