Talk:Aviadvigatel PS-90

Untitled

Comment: What has ETOPS got to do with noise? Someone needs to reword that paragraph! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.66.25.217 (talk) 17:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Engine name

Dear Sirs, Please, note that the engine marked PS-90 has never been existed. It was marked as PS-90A from the very beginning. In support of this you can turn to the articles about the PS-90A in the annual issues of the recognized Jane’s aviation encyclopedia for the years of 80-90-s. In addition, we use the information of the engine manufacturer; see the Aviadvigatel’s edition Engine-Building Design Bureau. 50 years. History Pages, 1989, the article From M-25 to PS-90A. See also the Aviadvigatel’s website about the PS-90A engine (http://www.avid.ru/eng/products/civil/ps-90a/). Based on the above the PS-90 title shall be changed to PS-90A, i.e. the false subject shall be removed from the encyclopedia. As the renaming I have tried to make the last time was rejected, please, give me advice what shall I do in such situation. Yours sincerely, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Solovei777 (talk • contribs) 09:18, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

I support the move to PS-90A, as all engine variants mentioned in the current PS-90 article follow the code PS-90A.. --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

PS-90A2 missing

Their used to be a run down on the PS-90A2 variant, but that seems to have been removed. 211.30.4.224 (talk) 08:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

I have reverted the edit that removed a large amount of cited text, to remove it again would need to be discussed here. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 10:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)