Talk:Automated medical scribe

Latest comment: 30 days ago by Gnomingstuff in topic Possible AI generated writing

Removing Heidi Health "audit" case study

edit

I am disclosing a WP:COI as an employee of Heidi Health. I am removing the specific mention of a "Heidi Health 2026 Audit" from the "Adoption and Challenges" section for the following reasons:

1. Undue Weight (WP:WEIGHT): Even if the cited audit existed, using one specific company’s unverified security claim as a general industry "case study" violates neutral point of view standards.

2. Verifiability (WP:V): The audit mentioned is a "ghost source" with no public record. It appears to be part of a coordinated smear campaign currently being investigated under WP:SPI.

3. Narrative Laundering: This text was inserted by User:Ryesaid0004 immediately after identical text was added to the Heidi Health brand page. This suggests an attempt to "launder" a brand-specific dispute into a broader industry narrative.

For the integrity of this general industry article, specific brand disputes without high-quality secondary sourcing should be avoided. M.A.Wiki 26 (talk) 02:10, 5 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Dealt with here Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Request_for_Revision_Deletion:_Grossly_defamatory/unsourced_claims_(Heidi_Health). Polygnotus (talk) 03:50, 5 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Possible AI generated writing

edit

Concerns were raised previously about AI-generated content in this article. This is a procedural talk page section to discuss it. There is no need to ping me in response. Read WP:AISIGNS for more information for why this is tagged; however, note that fixing the issue requires more than just removing the superficial signs. Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:23, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply