Talk:Asaram
(Redirected from Talk:Asaram Bapu)
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Zalaraz in topic Reverting of rumor based allegations
 | Tulsi Pujan Diwas was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 3 April 2025 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
 | Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_name_of_the_God_as_per_the_Vedas.svg){kind=small}
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 April 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Reverting of rumor based allegations
editAm raising issue on recent addition of this page which adds "He accused Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi to have conspired against him." The problem is the source itself mentions "No, I don't accuse anyone. I am just saying what I heard", at this level of conflicting coverage including it on page seems extra.
Or to put it in another way, can we use same source and would be comfortable adding a edit on page of say Sh Rahul Gandhi citing : They are alleged for so and so? Nisingh.8 (talk) 09:16, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- We can insert, later Asaram added "No, I don't accuse anyone. I am just saying what I heard". Zalaraz (talk) 12:53, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, that would at least make it better reflection of source. But then again why add such lengthy if-else statement on presumed allegation on page.. Nisingh.8 (talk) 14:33, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- For example, similar additions have been shot down on other notable person pages like Talk:Rahul Gandhi/Archive 1#Not a neutral articles citing Wikipedia is not a news website
- or similarly on Talk:Rahul Gandhi/Archive 1#Edit request from Ankush.sak, 9 June 2011 edit was not made citing sources did not unequivocally back up the statement Nisingh.8 (talk) 14:41, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- It is necessary to cite Asaram's own defense on his own page with regards to a serious charge. If you see such type of details missing for Rahul Gandhi then you can work on that article. Zalaraz (talk) 02:37, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
- We can insert, later Asaram added "No, I don't accuse anyone. I am just saying what I heard". Zalaraz (talk) 12:53, 2 May 2026 (UTC)