Talk:Angus Miller

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Shetland1963 in topic Further AFC Resubmission Explanation

AFC Resubmission Explanation

edit

I have revised the draft to address the previous decline reasons. All non-independent or non-reliable sources have been removed. The article now relies only on high-quality, secondary, independent sources.

To demonstrate notability per WP:GNG and WP:ENT, I have added multiple reviews from established publications that provide significant, in-depth coverage of Angus Miller’s work. These include:

• The Telegraph, WhatsOnStage, and The Skinny (2019) — substantive critical reviews discussing Miller’s performance as Ferdinand in The Duchess of Malfi. • The Stage, The Times, and North West End UK (2023) — independent reviews covering his performance as Stiva in Anna Karenina, each naming and discussing Miller directly. • The Arts Desk, Broadway Baby, and ReviewsGate (2023) — in-depth reviews covering his performance as Eck in Dead Dad Dog.

These nine independent sources provide clear, direct, non-trivial coverage of the subject, discussing his performances, critical reception, and contribution to major productions. They go beyond routine cast listings and establish notability through reliable, secondary, critical commentary.

All film/TV credits have been trimmed to include only those supported by reliable sourcing. The tables have been cleaned, over-referencing removed, and references consolidated to comply with WP:MINREF, WP:CITEKILL, and WP:BOMBARD guidance.

Please let me know if further adjustments are needed. Shetland1963 (talk) 22:25, 4 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Further AFC Resubmission Explanation

edit

Thank you for the previous reviews. I have now addressed all issues raised regarding source quality, reliability, link integrity, and depth of coverage.

Major improvements made in this revision:

• All previously broken or 404 links have been replaced with fully working citations. • All reviews cited now come from high-quality, independent, professionally edited publications, including The Telegraph, The Stage, The Times, The Skinny, North West End UK, The Arts Desk, Broadway Baby, and ReviewsGate. – These sources contain substantial, in-depth critical commentary about Angus Miller’s performances, not passing mentions. • Added strong, independent coverage for Shetland, including Daily Express and Radio Times, addressing concerns about lack of significant discussion of his TV work. • TV table citations for Shetland, Outlander, and Dept. Q now use the strongest RS options available, with only 1–2 per credit to avoid citation clutter. • Removed or trimmed weaker credits, non-RS sources, fan sites, and agency CVs (except where allowed for non-notability claims such as episode counts). • Critical reception section added, with only nine carefully chosen reviews to avoid notoriety-dump concerns while still demonstrating clear notability across multiple major productions. • Article rewritten for neutral tone, with no promotional language. • All content has been checked for compliance with WP:BIO, WP:ACTOR, WP:SIGCOV, WP:RS, WP:INDEP, and WP:BLP.

I believe this updated draft now meets the requirements for notability, with multiple independent, secondary, reliable sources providing significant coverage of the subject’s work.

Thank you very much for your time and review. Shetland1963 (talk) 10:44, 5 December 2025 (UTC)Reply