- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to the title suggested originally by the nominator. (non-admin closure) Bobby Cohn (talk) 16:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Aldo, Giovanni & Giacomo → Aldo, Giovanni e Giacomo – I don't think the "&" symbol is appropriate in this case. JacktheBrown (talk) 07:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. SilverLocust 💬 11:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Note: only one Requested move template is allowed at a time, so the alternative suggestion, Aldo, Giovanni and GiacomoAldo, Giovanni and Giacomo, has been relocated to this note. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 19:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Note2: See MOS:& for helpful info. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 19:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Move to Aldo, Giovanni and Giacomo, with a secondary preference for the original proposal. Both variations seem to be used to some extent in English, but I haven't been able to find a large number of English-language RS on this trio in general. Thus, I believe this falls under the scope of the
no established English-language treatment
portion of WP:UE, which advises us to translate the name – thus leading "and" to be preferable over "e". That said, both proposed titles are preferable to the current one under MOS:&. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 15:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Support per nomination. All Italian sources use the form "Aldo, Giovanni e Giacomo". At least one English-language source uses "Aldo, Giovanni and Giacomo". Would not oppose Aldo, Giovanni & Giacomo → Aldo, Giovanni and Giacomo per ModernDayTrilobite. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 15:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:54, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.