Talk:Air Serbia Flight 324/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: JustARandomSquid (talk · contribs) 19:04, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 00:03, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Really interesting, I will review this. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 00:03, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Lead

• Add how the investigation was done

• I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to? But I have expanded the lead a little bit, so you can take a look at that. JustARandomSquid (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

• subsequently striking remove "subsequently"

• Done. JustARandomSquid (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

• before climbing I think you should change this to "taking off" or "launching"; climbing is the wrong term here.

• It's already taken off, though. The next stage of flight is Climb (aeronautics). Do you think 'ascent' might be less technical? JustARandomSquid (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Background

• Marathon operated aircraft for five other airlines at the time of the accident why is this placed this early?

• Honestly, I didn't know where else to put it, but I've pushed it to the end of the paragraph. JustARandomSquid (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

• Aside from the jet involved in the accident redundant with "another"

• I've changed it to read "a total of five". JustARandomSquid (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

• Source 4 cannot be accessed

• Not even through the archive? JustARandomSquid (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

The archive is okay, did a minor change. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 02:40, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

• Please link "Vienna" and "Belgrade"

• Done. JustARandomSquid (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Accident

• 2-hour, 10-minute flight I do not see this in the source

• The exact time isn't necessary (it wouldn't have taken precisely that long anyway, and people can estimate the distance between the two cities themselves), so I've reworked the sentence. JustARandomSquid (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

• 2,347 should be 2,349
• 1,234 should be 1,273

• Done. Very embarrassing, just making up a number — I have no idea how I did that. (Also, 1234? What sort of number is that?) JustARandomSquid (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Investigation

• complicated by the involvement → complicated due to the involvement

• I meant it in the sense of 'to complicate — make something more complicated', so it's grammatically correct. I prefer my version because it's safe to assume the involvement of 5 countries was not the primary reason the investigation of Serbia's most serious passenger aviation accident was complicated. JustARandomSquid (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

• pilot error, however also criticises → pilot error, but also criticised

  I've rewritten the sentence to be a bit clearer, the report criticised the airport procedures, not the investigation per se. The verbs match now. JustARandomSquid (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Aftermath

I see nothing wrong here.

@JustARandomSquid: finished review. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 04:17, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

@TheNuggeteer: Responded. JustARandomSquid (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Everything looks okay. Passing now. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 02:41, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.