Talk:Adrian Baril/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 20:19, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 02:25, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

I'll do this one. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:25, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Fair use rational is all good. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:25, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

No stability or neutrality issues. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

There is not too much detail. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:27, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Breadth is good. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Earwig found no issues. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

I will check sources 6, 20, 36, 38, and 49. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

All are good. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:49, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Why do some sources call the college team the Cadets and the newer ones call them Tommies. Was there a name change? History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:52, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

The article also says that he specialized in weight events in track and field events. I do not know if America is different, but in Canada where I am from track and field does not encompass weightlifting. Should this be put in a different sentence unrelated to track and field. Or if it doesn't mean weightlifting then there should be an explanation. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Can you please change the ancestry.ca reference to a proper template. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

I tried and it didn't work so this is fine. History6042😊 (Contact me) 15:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Is one source not having his high school enough to say it is unknown.? History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:00, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

I found more so this is fine. History6042😊 (Contact me) 15:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

For the sentence about his marriage, I don't think the bride's surname should be there unless it is her maiden name. I think this because he didn't marry a Marguerite Baril, he married a Marguerite ___, who then became Marguerite Baril. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:03, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

A source for his middle name should be added as an inline ciation. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:06, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Could a caption be added for the image? @BeanieFan11; pinging as this is the last comment I have, once you fix these I can pass the article. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:07, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

None of the remaining issues are preventative from this becoming a GA, just things to make it better, pass. History6042😊 (Contact me) 15:17, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.