Talk:AMBER

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of molecular biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived by if there are more than 5.

Image

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The image actually used MM2 but I don't think there is a visible difference. Bensaccount 19:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Author

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't think the authors isn't necessary to be listed in wiki. Or at least, I think they should be listed on the Software section, not in the introduction. What do you think about that? Lý Minh Nhật (talk) 03:56, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Improper Dihedral

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Does the potential energy function of Amber Focefield have improper dihedral term? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.236.198.181 (talk) 14:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AMBER. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050829021414/http://amber.ch.ic.ac.uk:80/archive/ to http://amber.ch.ic.ac.uk/archive/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:39, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

force field terms should define what the variables mean

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

e.g. in the non-bonded terms f sub ij is not defined. I imagine it is a factor that is 0 for 1-3 bonded atoms, and possibly 0.5 for 1-4 interactions, and 1.0 for other atom-atom interactions.

rij 0 = (r i + r sub j) for two atoms interacting eij = sqrt( ei * ej ) for the two atoms interacting

1/4pie0 = 332.0637 kcal/mol-coulomb 2601:47:477E:43C0:70F3:9D1D:3893:A567 (talk) 13:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic