Talk:2025 Lucknow Super Giants season/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) 10:47, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: BlackJack (talk · contribs) 22:32, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Starting

Hi, Vestrian24Bio, I'll review this for you. All the best, Jack (talk) 22:32, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Table

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Review

As the table shows, this is fine. It would need a lot more narrative, perhaps, if you wanted to take it to FAC, but it's fine for GA. I chose a sample of references, which were all good. Those were nos 7, 11, 19, 25, 36, and 40.

Well done, Vestrian24Bio. I'm promoting this to WP:GA. Jack (talk) 19:50, 14 January 2026 (UTC)