Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Act 2015

The Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Act 2015[α] (c. 3) is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Act 2015
Act of Parliament
coat of arms
Long titleAn Act to make provision as to matters to which a court must have regard in determining a claim in negligence or breach of statutory duty.
Citation2015 c. 3
Introduced byChris Grayling (Commons)
Lord Faulks (Lords)
Territorial extent England and Wales
Dates
Royal assent12 February 2015 (2015-02-12)
Commencement13 April 2015; 11 years ago (2015-04-13)
Status: Current legislation
History of passage through Parliament
Text of statute as originally enacted
Text of the Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Act 2015 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk.

The Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill was introduced to the House of Commons as a government bill by the Secretary of State for Justice, Chris Grayling on 12 June 2014, and given royal assent on 12 February 2015, coming into force as the Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Act 2015 on 13 April 2015.

Background

edit
Chris Grayling in June 2017
Lord Faulks in March 2018

The 2010 Conservative–Liberal Democrat coalition agreement contained a commitment to "take a range of measures to encourage volunteering and involvement in social action".[1]

The Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill was introduced to the House of Commons as a Government bill by the Secretary of State for Justice, Chris Grayling on 12 June 2014.[2][3] The Bill was noted for its brevity, at just over 300 words.[4] The Bill was introduced to the House of Lords by the Minister of State for Justice, Lord Faulks, on 21 October 2014,[2][3] where the criticism of Lord Pannick was noted for its intensity.[5] The act was given royal assent on 12 February 2015, and came into force on 13 April 2015.[6]

The act extends only to England and Wales.[7]

Commentary

edit

Necessity

edit

The opposition Labour Party described the bill as a "vacuous waste of time".[8] Lord Pannick called it "the most ridiculous piece of legislation approved by Parliament in a very long time".[9]

As of May 2020, there were no reported cases of the provisions within the Act having been applied.[10]

In 2025, the Act was referenced in a Hetherington v Fell & Anor [2025] EWHC 1487 (KB) (16 June 2025) around the liability for a collision between a car and a bicycle during a cycling event.

The court held that the cycling club organising the event was "acting for the benefit of members of society" and therefore "the standard of care to be applied when exercising the duty of care during the risk assessments [by the club] was that of a reasonably competent and reasonably informed volunteer".

Notes

edit
  1. Sometimes abbreviated as SARAH or Sarah. Not to be confused with Sarah's Law.

References

edit

Bibliography

edit
edit