Session 9 is a 2001 American psychological horror[5] film directed by Brad Anderson, written by Anderson and Stephen Gevedon, and starring David Caruso, Peter Mullan, Brendan Sexton III, Josh Lucas, and Gevedon. The film follows an asbestos abatement crew who take a clean-up job at the abandoned Danvers State Psychiatric Hospital amid an intense work schedule, growing tensions, and mysterious events occurring around them. Its title refers to a series of audio-taped psychiatric sessions with a former asylum patient, Mary Hobbes, that run parallel to the crew's experiences.[6]

Session 9
Dark, brown-tinted and horror-themed image of a man in an asbestos-removal suit (to the right side of the poster), with an image of a chair (in the middle of the image) and an image of a large castle-like building at the top of the image. The text "Session 9" is emboldened in white text in the middle of the image, and near the bottom of the image is written, "Fear is a place."
Theatrical release poster
Directed byBrad Anderson
Written by
Produced by
Starring
CinematographyUta Briesewitz
Edited byBrad Anderson
Music by
Production
companies
Distributed byUSA Films
Release dates
Running time
100 minutes[2]
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$1.5 million[3]
Box office$1.6 million[4]

The film marked a tonal departure for Anderson, who previously directed only romantic comedies. Anderson and Gevedon began developing the screenplay in the late 1990s, utilizing the Danvers State Hospital as a central location for the story. The film was partly inspired by the case of Richard Rosenthal, a man who murdered and mutilated his wife at their Boston home in 1995.[7]

Principal photography of Session 9 took place on location at the actual disused Danvers State Hospital in Danvers, Massachusetts in the fall of 2000. It was one of the first motion pictures to be shot in 24p HD digital video, shot by cinematographer Uta Briesewitz.[8] The film's original score was composed by the experimental music group Climax Golden Twins, with a contribution from Vladimir Ussachevsky.

Session 9 premiered at the Fantasia International Film Festival on July 31, 2001, before receiving a limited theatrical release in the United States on August 10, 2001. While not a financial success in the United States, the film received largely favorable reviews, and has gone on to develop a reputation as a cult film.[9]

Plot

edit

Gordon Fleming, the owner of an asbestos abatement company in Massachusetts, makes a bid to remove asbestos from Danvers State Hospital. Desperate for money, he promises to complete the job in only one week, even though a work of this scale would normally require two to three weeks. His crew includes Mike, a law school dropout knowledgeable about the asylum's history; Phil, who is dealing with his grief over a recent breakup; Hank, a gambling addict; and Gordon's nephew Jeff, who has a pathological fear of the dark.

While surveying the job site, Gordon hears a disembodied voice that greets him by name. The men begin their job. Mike discovers a box containing nine audio-taped therapy sessions with Mary Hobbes, a former patient with dissociative identity disorder. Mike listens to the tapes in the ensuing days. In the sessions, Mary's psychologist attempts to unveil details surrounding a crime she committed at her home. Mary exhibits numerous personalities with unique voices and demeanors.

Meanwhile, Hank discovers a cache of antique silver dollar coins and other valuables from the crematory in the hospital's labyrinthine basement. Late that night, he returns to the hospital to retrieve the items and discovers a lobotomy pick among them. He becomes frightened by noises and a shadowy figure, and is confronted by an unknown assailant.

When Hank fails to show up to work the next day, Craig McManus is hired to take his place. Gordon confides in Phil that he slapped his wife Wendy after she inadvertently splashed him with boiling water. Afterward, she refused to answer his calls or let him see their infant daughter. In a stairwell in the hospital, Jeff witnesses Hank staring out a window wearing sunglasses, talking to himself.

Hank goes missing and the men split up to search for him, but Mike is compelled to continue listening to the tapes. Jeff and Phil descend into the tunnels beneath the hospital, where Phil finds Hank, half-nude, muttering to himself. The generator runs out of fuel, leaving a terrified Jeff trapped in darkness. Mike restores the electricity and continues listening to the ninth and final tape, which reveals that one of Mary's malignant personalities, "Simon", was responsible for her murdering her family. Phil finds Gordon in Mary's former hospital room, staring at photos from his daughter's baptism which he has pasted to the wall. Jeff emerges from the tunnels and is attacked by an unseen assailant at the company van.

The following day, Gordon arrives at the hospital and finds Hank wrapped in plastic sheeting in one of the rooms, the lobotomy pick protruding from his eye. He is then confronted by Phil, who repeatedly tells him to "wake up" before vanishing. Craig witnesses Gordon standing over Hank, who is barely alive. Gordon attacks Craig before pulling the lobotomy pick from Hank's eye and stabbing it into Craig's. Gordon, in a dissociated state, finds the bodies of each of his men in various rooms in the hospital, and recounts his murdering each of them. He also recalls killing Wendy, his daughter and their dog after Wendy spilled the boiling water on him.

Distraught, Gordon confusedly attempts to call his home to apologize to Wendy. An excerpt from the ninth tape plays: Mary's doctor asks her "And where do you live, Simon?", to which "Simon" responds: "I live in the weak and the wounded, Doc."

Cast

edit

Interpretations

edit

In reviewing the film for the 2003 edition of The Year's Best Fantasy and Horror, Edward Bryant contends that Simon is not necessarily an alternate personality of the former patient Mary, but rather a malevolent genius loci.[10] He also points out that the deleted scenes included on the DVD help fill out the narrative.[10] Several critics have also pointed out similarities and references to Stanley Kubrick's The Shining (1980), which also deals with similar themes and involves a man's psychological unraveling in an isolated location.[11][12][13]

Brian Keiper, writing for Bloody Disgusting, notes that "the real stories of Danvers are woven into the fabric of Session 9's plot, giving a sense of semi-documentary to elements of the proceedings. Though only tangential to the plot, Mike’s story of Patricia Willard (a fictional story created to illustrate a real trend) makes an important thematic point. It deals with the controversial subject of Satanic Ritual Abuse, the retrieval of repressed memories, and the questionable credibility surrounding such stories and practices."[14] Keiper interprets the film's conclusion as intentionally ambiguous, rendering it unclear as to whether Gordon's deteriorating mental state and crimes are the result of a psychological disorder, or a demonic entity—the same entity that may have possessed Mary—utilizing him as a host.[14] Psychiatry scholar Heike Schwarz echoes this sentiment, noting that the film contains dual interpretations, referring to "DID and a possible possession with a demonic personality".[15]

Production

edit

Development

edit
The film is set at the Danvers State Hospital (pictured in 1893), where it was also filmed

Session 9 was director Brad Anderson's first horror film, after directing two romantic comedy films, Next Stop Wonderland (1998) and Happy Accidents (2000).[6] Anderson described Session 9 as an "American tragedy", and states that he and screenwriter Stephen Gevedon aimed "to subvert the conventions of the so-called horror genre that exists now", which he describes as "less horror than it is teen thriller."[16]

The film's plot was inspired by the Richard Rosenthal case, a murder that took place in Boston, where Anderson grew up, in 1995, in which Rosenthal murdered his wife after she accidentally burnt his dinner, then cut out her heart and lungs and put them in his backyard on a stake.[7][9][16] Anderson states that it was also, "as you imagine, very much inspired by the location", the Danvers State Psychiatric Hospital.[17] Anderson had been residing in Boston in the late 1990s, and would frequently drive past the Danvers State Hospital: "When Steve and I were first brainstorming, we didn't have the framework of what we wanted to hang our horror film on. But then I remembered Danvers, and we thought it’d be cool to set a story [there], for a number of reasons. It would be contained, for one thing, and it would be maybe even more practical in terms of actually doing it, because we could keep it all in one location."[9]

Don't Look Now, directed by Nicolas Roeg, was one inspiration for the film, for its sense of place and because the lead character realizes in the climax that he is at the heart of the mystery.[18] Anderson also cited The Shining (1980) as an influence, specifically in the screenplay's sectioning of events by days of the week.[19] Anderson has stated that he aimed to use sound to convey the plot as well as to generate "a creepy tone"; the sound design incorporated the subliminal use of animal and mechanical noises.[16]

After pitching the project to USA Films, the studio agreed to distribute the film, with a production budget of approximately $1.5 million.[3]

Casting

edit

Anderson cast Peter Mullan in the lead role of Gordon, and had been a longtime admirer of his after seeing his performance in My Name Is Joe (1998).[20] He also said that he felt that audiences "would be able to relate to him as a hard working blue-collar man with a new family."[21] Josh Lucas was cast as Hank after auditioning for the part, and later commented that he was drawn to playing the character because he was "a working class asshole... he was just a prick, and it was terrific fun to play him that way."[22] David Caruso was cast in the film at the suggestion of USA Films executives, who had a working relationship with him.[23] Anderson commented that while Caruso was an "offbeat choice" for his role, the "combination felt very real to me—a little real because it wasn't predictable."[24]

Brendan Sexton III was cast as Jeff, Gordon's nephew, based on the filmmakers' admiration of his performance in Welcome to the Dollhouse (1995).[25] Larry Fessenden, an acquaintance of Anderson's, was given a minor role as Craig McManus, a replacement worker hired on the crew.[26]

To prepare for their roles, as well as the potential exposure risks while filming in the hospital, the principal cast members went through asbestos abatement training.[27]

Filming

edit

Principal photography of Session 9 began in mid-September 2000 on location at the dilapidated Danvers State Hospital, where the film is set.[28][29] According to actor David Caruso, the cast and crew were limited to only certain portions of the building as much of it was "unsafe" for shooting.[16] Caruso claimed the sets largely did not need to be dressed as all the props featured in the film were already existing in the building.[16] Elaborating, Caruso said:

It was a place you never got comfortable in. It wasn't like day three and we were throwing water balloons because it was so much fun to be there. It was always scary. You can really feel the pain of the people that went through Danvers. It's a rough environment. It's not fun. It's on the film. They didn't have to dress any sets, or anything. All of that stuff was sitting there. The federal government walked away from it about thirty years ago. It was a terrifying location.[29]

Cinematographer Uta Briesewitz shot the film in 24p HD digital video

Gevedon recalled that, "technically, no one was supposed to be in there. There was asbestos, the floors were collapsing, there were rusty pipes and lead paint everywhere. I mean, it was a disaster zone, much of that building. But somehow, I can't remember, our producers knew someone in the Massachusetts film office who knew someone in the Massachusetts government who was able to grease some wheels and get us permission to shoot there, as long as we stayed within certain confined areas."[9]

Anderson stated that the majority of the set dressing consisted of "enhancing what was already there."[30] The production designers made some slight additions, such as graffiti, as well as creating the collages covering the walls of Mary Hobbes's former room, which were inspired by similar patients' collages that the crew had found in the building.[31] Crew members recalled occasionally finding medical tissue and blood samples in the building that had been left behind after the hospital's closure.[32]

Session 9 was one of the first motion pictures to be shot in 24p HD digital video,[8] which shoots at 24 frames-per-second like film, as opposed to regular digital video which shoots at 30 frames-per-second. The film was shot by German cinematographer Uta Briesewitz.[8]

While filming the sequence in which Hank is pursued by a figure in the subterranean tunnels beneath the hospital, Briesewitz—who was operating a handheld camera—was injured after running into a medical cart that had been abandoned in the tunnel, striking her face on the metal prong of a surgical device.[33] The prong punctured the camera's eyecup and punctured the corner of her eye socket, nearly piercing her eye.[34] The injury paralleled the Hank character's eventual demise by a transorbital lobotomy, in which a lobotomy pick is forced into his eye socket.[33]

Post-production

edit

The majority of the film's post-production process involved the recording of the session tapes between Mary Hobbes (voiced by Jurian Hughes) and her doctor (voiced by Lonnie Farmer), as well as crafting soundscapes to accompany the film.[35]

Alternate ending

edit

Following test screenings for the film, Anderson excised several sequences in which it is revealed that a homeless woman squatting in the hospital could be the potential source for the strange occurrences experienced by the crew working there.[36] In the film's finale, the woman, after fearfully witnessing Gordon murder each member of his crew, confronts him in Mary Hobbes's cell and bludgeons him to death with a flashlight.[37] Anderson described this as a "misdirect," and chose to remove it as audience members incorrectly assumed the character to be Mary Hobbes.[36]

Soundtrack

edit
Session 9
Soundtrack album by
ReleasedAugust 21, 2001 (2001-08-21)[38]
RecordedGravelvoice Studio (Seattle, Washington)[38]
Genre
Length50:50
LabelMilan

The original score to Session 9 was composed by the Seattle-based experimental band Climax Golden Twins.[39] The score features elements of ambient and dark ambient music.[38] The soundtrack was released on August 21, 2001, through Milan Records. "Choke Chain" by Sentridoh is played over the closing credits of the film, but is not featured on the album.[ii]

Track listing

All tracks are written by Climax Golden Twins (Scott Colburn, Robert Millis, Jeffrey Taylor), except "Piece for Tape Recorder", written and recorded by Vladimir Ussachevsky.

No.TitleLength
1."A Few Simple Up and Down Jerks"4:35
2."Hobbes Theme"2:10
3."Noon, About Noon"5:06
4."I Live in the Gut"6:11
5."Mortified Pride"1:41
6."Exit Plan"2:14
7."I Want to Talk to Amy"1:13
8."I Saw You"2:01
9."Ward A"5:56
10."Seclusion"3:26
11."Disappointed Expectations"10:39
12."Piece for Tape Recorder" (Vladimir Ussachevsky)5:38

Release

edit

Session 9 premiered at the Fantasia International Film Festival on July 31, 2001.[40][41] The film opened in Boston, Massachusetts at the Loews Common Theatre on August 8, 2001.[42] It was given a limited theatrical release two days later on August 10, playing in Boston, New York City, and Los Angeles before expanding over the Labor Day weekend.[42] It ended its American theatrical run on October 18, 2001.[4]

Home media

edit

USA Films and Universal Pictures Home Entertainment released VHS[43] and DVD editions of Session 9 on February 26, 2002.[44] A Blu-ray edition was released in August 2016 by Scream Factory.[45] In the United Kingdom, a limited edition Blu-ray set was released by Second Sight Films on December 27, 2021.[46]

Reception

edit

Box office

edit

Session 9 earned $76,493 during its opening weekend,[4] screening in Boston, Los Angeles, and New York City.[42] The film eventually went on to gross a total of $378,176 in the United States.[4] The film was a greater financial success abroad, earning $1.2 million in international markets.[4]

Critical response

edit

On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 68% of 75 critics' reviews are positive, with an average rating of 6.3/10. The website's consensus reads: "Relying more on atmosphere than gore, Session 9 is effectively creepy."[47] Metacritic, which uses a weighted average, assigned the film a score of 58 out of 100, based on 16 critics, indicating "mixed or average" reviews.[48] Some critics praised the film's dark, eerie atmosphere and lack of gore. Entertainment Weekly called the film "a marvel of vérité nightmare atmosphere".[49] Rolling Stone called it "a spine-tingler", and praised Brad Anderson's direction.[50] Slant Magazine favorably compared it to the 1973 film Don't Look Now, writing, "Anderson's creeper is nowhere near as profound, but the film's old-fashioned pacing and revelatory camerawork bring to mind [Nicolas] Roeg's uniquely terrifying dreamworlds."[51] Ron Wells of Film Threat praised the film's atmosphere and found it effectively frightening, awarding it four out of five stars.[52]

Kevin Thomas of the Los Angeles Times said of the film: "Session 9 is so effective that its sense of uncertainty lingers long after the theater lights have gone up."[53] Jeffrey M. Anderson of the San Francisco Examiner praised the film's psychological elements, noting: "The horrors in Session 9 are all internal—there are no ghosts or zombies or chainsaw-wielding maniacs, just shadows, strange images and half-seen clues."[54] The Edmonton Journal's Todd Babiak similarly praised the film's sparse storytelling, writing: "Since the script never tries to explain all the evil in the universe, we don't have to endure weak and unsuccessful histories or philosophies. Instead, we get a small pocket of devilry that might just leap off the screen and infect us."[55] Susanna Sonnenberg of the Missoulian found the film's characters well-written and realistic, adding that the screenplay's structure effectively "relies on what is suggested rather than presented, a sense of what might be there but isn't certain."[56]

Some reviewers criticized the film's ending. A negative review came from Variety's Robert Koehler, who wrote, "while pic works up a nervously eerie paranoia, it finally doesn't know what to do with what it sets up."[57] Edward Guthmann of the San Francisco Chronicle felt that "the story doesn't quite pay off, the characters are underwritten and the surprise ending is contrived and unconvincing."[58] The Village Voice's Amy Taubin wrote, "the script for Session 9 is so underwritten that even such lively character actors as David Caruso, Peter Mullan and Brendan Sexton III are left stranded."[59] The Boston Globe's Jay Carr similarly panned the film, writing that, as it progresses into its final act, "the store of ominousness shrinks and gives way to silliness, leaving some talented actors high and dry. As if cursed, Session 9 becomes glossy claptrap that plays like its own lobotomy."[60]

Owen Gleiberman of Entertainment Weekly gave the film a B- rating, commending it as "a marvel of vérité nightmare atmosphere" but conceding: "This is a movie in which the 1970s and '80s loom as the graveyard of the psychoanalytic past, and there are tantalizing references to multiple personality disorder and repressed memory syndrome. The trouble is, they remain motifs, scripted rather than connected. The story, a potpourri of fright devices (midnight stalker, overly foreshadowed lobotomy maiming), keeps undercutting the grainy Blair Witch mood established by Anderson's intuitive camera eye."[61] Dave Kehr, in a mixed review for The New York Times, praises the "impeccable" performances and the dialogue's "authentic working-class snap", but criticizes the pacing which "often feels long and aimless", and concludes that the film "loses any sense of urgency or structure" because of Anderson's choice to leave the connections between events unstated.[62]

Accolades

edit
Award/association Year Category Recipient(s) and nominee(s) Result Ref.
Fangoria Chainsaw Awards 2002 Best Actor Peter Mullan Nominated
Best Limited-Release/Direct-to-Video Film Session 9 Nominated [63]
Fright Meter Awards 2001 Best Horror Film Won [63]
Sitges Film Festival 2001 Best Director Brad Anderson Won [64]
Best Film Nominated [63]

Modern appraisal

edit

Session 9 developed a cult following in the years after its original release, mainly through DVD rentals and word of mouth.[9][11] Bloody Disgusting ranked the film fifth in its list of the twenty best horror films of the 2000s, writing, "Session 9 isn't just a cheap, hack 'n' slash, instantly-forgettable type horror film, but a psychologically probing, deeply unsettling journey off the edge and into the abyss of the human mind."[65] Brian Keiper, also writing for Bloody Disgusting, hailed it as "one of the most unsettling movies of the century so far."[14] Actor Jim Cummings cited it as one of his favorite films in a 2020 interview with Entertainment Weekly, commenting: "There’s a 45-minute chunk in that film that is actually the most frightening thing I've ever seen. There’s this terrifying spooky inevitability in the film."[66]

By 2021 it had been picked up for streaming by Netflix, and in its 20th anniversary year was screened at the Brooklyn Horror Film Festival.[67][68] In a retrospectives for its twentieth anniversary, Marisa Mirabel of /Film called it an "underrated gem [that] was ahead of its time in terms of atmospheric and psychological horror."[69] Also in 2021, Rolling Stone Australia ranked it number 47 in a list of the 65 best horror films of the 21st century.[70]

Writer John Kenneth Muir praised the film in his book Horror Films of 2000–2009 (2023), writing: "Session 9 is a resourceful and careful film. It's a masterpiece of mood too; a low-budget horror film that succeeds by suggesting, not showing the forces at work in the characters. And the setting itself—especially the Psych Wing—is utterly terrifying."[71]

edit

Proposed prequel

edit

It was reported in August 2021 that Anderson and Gevedon had pitched a prequel to the film in 2020, which followed the Mary Hobbes character.[9] However, the film's rights holder, Focus Features—a subsidiary of Universal Pictures—who had acquired USA Films shortly after the film's release, would not allow it.[69] Anderson commented:

We did a lot of work on it, but this is how it went down: we did it before we talked to the powers-that-be at Focus, which now owns the intellectual property for Session 9, whether they knew it or not at the time. We wrote a pretty solid treatment for the script and were really excited about it. We had some producers that were really interested in doing it, and even financing it... Next thing you know we get the calls from the [Focus Features'] lawyer saying, "Well, you can't do that. We own that property, and we don't normally allow filmmakers to make sequels or prequels to our movies." And were like, "Well, we made the movie, you know what I mean? We just want to make a cool film based on the movie that you made with us, like, 18 years ago." And what it boiled down to was that, on purely legal terms, they just decided they didn't want to move forward with it.[9]

Novelization

edit

On October 4, 2024, an official novelization of the film by writer Christian Francis was published through Echo On Publications.[72][73]

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. As credited in copyright of closing credits.
  2. As noted in the film's closing credits.

References

edit
  1. "Collections Search - Session 9". British Film Institute. Archived from the original on June 1, 2026.
  2. "Session 9". AFI Catalog of Feature Films. American Film Institute. Archived from the original on October 18, 2023.
  3. 1 2 Hamman, Cody (December 10, 2024). "Session 9 (2001) Revisited – Horror Movie Review". JoBlo.com. Archived from the original on January 19, 2025.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 "Session 9 (2001)". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on February 25, 2025.
  5. Paig, Claudia (August 10, 2001). "'Session 9' won't scare up intrigue". USA Today. p. 6E via Newspapers.com.
  6. 1 2 Monagle, Matthew (August 10, 2016). "Brad Anderson's "Session 9": The Little Leap From Comedy to Killing". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on September 16, 2025.
  7. 1 2 "Husband Guilty in Slaying". The New York Times. The Associated Press. November 8, 1996. Archived from the original on November 21, 2023.
  8. 1 2 3 Murray, Noel (February 27, 2013). "Session 9 turns an abandoned asylum and digital video's limits into assets". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved October 31, 2022.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Wampler, Scott (August 10, 2021). "The Team Behind SESSION 9 Looks Back (And Forward), 20 Years Later". Fangoria. Archived from the original on May 31, 2025.
  10. 1 2 Datlow & Windling 2003, p. LXXXVIII.
  11. 1 2 Tobias, Scott (November 24, 2010). "Session 9". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 18, 2024.
  12. Muir, John Kenneth (June 7, 2010). "CULT MOVIE REVIEW: Session 9 (2001)". John Kenneth Muir's Reflections on Cult Movies and Classic TV. Archived from the original on February 4, 2018. Retrieved February 4, 2018.
  13. Collins, Brian (August 17, 2016). "Collins' Crypt: SESSION 9 Scares Me Even More Now". Birth.Movies.Death. Archived from the original on February 4, 2018.
  14. 1 2 3 Keiper, Brian (August 10, 2021). "The Weak and the Wounded: Danvers, Demons, and the Heart of Darkness in 'Session 9'". Bloody Disgusting. Archived from the original on October 8, 2024.
  15. Schwarz 2014, p. 296.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 Cavagna, Carlo (August 2001). "David Caruso and Brad Anderson on Session 9 (2001)". AboutFilm.com. Archived from the original on December 19, 2019.
  17. Beckerman, Jim (August 9, 2001). "Imagining the Worst". The Record. p. F-8 via Newspapers.com.
  18. Prophete, Bettina (2001). "The Brad Anderson Sessions: On "Session 9" and "Happy Accidents"". AMC. Archived from the original on July 16, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2010.
  19. Clark & Wallick 2016, 7:49.
  20. Clark & Wallick 2016, 16:00.
  21. Canfield, Dave (October 14, 2004). "Brad Anderson: An Interview With the Director of Session 9 and The Machinist". ScreenAnarchy. Archived from the original on May 15, 2025.
  22. Clark & Wallick 2016, 14:14.
  23. Clark & Wallick 2016, 14:34.
  24. Clark & Wallick 2016, 15:27.
  25. Clark & Wallick 2016, 13:08.
  26. Clark & Wallick 2016, 18:04.
  27. Clark & Wallick 2016, 24:30.
  28. Blowen, Michael; Sullivan, Jim (September 27, 2000). "Grounds for horror". The Boston Globe. p. D4 via Newspapers.com.
  29. 1 2 Orange, B. Alan (July 23, 2001). "Agent Orange: Session 9 with Director Brad Anderson & David Caruso". MovieWeb. Archived from the original on October 31, 2025.
  30. Clark & Wallick 2016, 23:14.
  31. Clark & Wallick 2016, 23:20–23:55.
  32. Clark & Wallick 2016, 22:38.
  33. 1 2 Clark & Wallick 2016, 29:40–33:55.
  34. Clark & Wallick 2016, 31:54.
  35. Clark & Wallick 2016, 37:00–39:00.
  36. 1 2 Clark & Wallick 2016, 41:30–41:56.
  37. Session 9 (Deleted scenes and alternate ending (Blu-ray feature)). Scream Factory. OCLC 958435197.
  38. 1 2 3 4 5 Carruthers, Sean. "Session 9 – Original Soundtrack". AllMusic. Archived from the original on September 29, 2020.
  39. Clark & Wallis 2016, 39:04.
  40. "History – Cinemabox & Unisoft Present Fantasia 2012". Fantasia Festival. Archived from the original on June 28, 2018. Retrieved September 15, 2012.
  41. "Imperial Cinéma". The Gazette. July 31, 2001. p. D8 via Newspapers.com.
  42. 1 2 3 "Their horror is intriguing". The Boston Globe. August 10, 2001. p. D4 via Newspapers.com.
  43. Session 9 (VHS). Universal Pictures Home Entertainment. 2002. OCLC 49216271.
  44. Beierle, Chris (February 27, 2002). "Session 9: DVD Talk Review". DVD Talk. Archived from the original on August 16, 2025.
  45. "Session 9". Shout! Factory. Archived from the original on August 16, 2024.
  46. "Session 9 Blu-ray (Limited Edition)". Blu-ray.com. Archived from the original on December 2, 2022.
  47. "Session 9". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango Media. Retrieved May 30, 2026. Edit this at Wikidata
  48. "Session 9". Metacritic. Fandom, Inc. Retrieved May 30, 2026.
  49. Gleiberman, Owen (August 8, 2001). "Session 9". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on October 19, 2023. Retrieved October 31, 2022.
  50. Travers, Peter (August 17, 2001). "Session 9". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on November 28, 2012. Retrieved August 9, 2012.
  51. Gonzalez, Ed (July 30, 2001). "Review: Session 9". Slant Magazine. Archived from the original on October 9, 2020. Retrieved August 9, 2012.
  52. Wells, Ron (August 10, 2001). "Session 9". Film Threat. Archived from the original on January 7, 2005.
  53. Thomas, Kevin (August 10, 2001). "Scary 'Session 9' Takes a Minimalist Approach". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved August 9, 2012.
  54. Anderson, Jeffrey M. (September 14, 2001). "Going mental". San Francisco Examiner. p. C6 via Newspapers.com.
  55. Babiak, Todd (October 19, 2010). "Character, story keep Session 9 consistently creepy". Edmonton Journal. p. E3 via Newspapers.com.
  56. Sonnenberg, Susanna (September 28, 2001). "Abatement can't remove the terror from 'Session 9'". Missoulian. p. E6 via Newspapers.com.
  57. Koehler, Robert (August 6, 2001). "Session 9". Variety. Archived from the original on November 11, 2010.
  58. Guthmann, Edward (September 14, 2001). "Film Clips / Also Opening Today". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on December 13, 2014.
  59. Taubin, Amy (August 7, 2001). "The Shinings". The Village Voice. Archived from the original on October 13, 2010. Retrieved August 9, 2012.
  60. Carr, Jay (August 10, 2001). "Scares are scarce in haunted houses". The Boston Globe. p. D5 via Newspapers.com.
  61. Gleiberman, Owen (August 8, 2001). "Session 9". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on March 28, 2009.
  62. Kehr, David (August 10, 2001). "Film Review; Getting More Than They Bargained For When They Submitted the Low Bid". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 2, 2020. Retrieved January 2, 2020.
  63. 1 2 3 "Session 9". TV Guide. Archived from the original on August 13, 2024.
  64. "Awards 2001". Sitges Film Festival. Archived from the original on January 3, 2026.
  65. Bloody Disgusting Staff (December 18, 2009). "00's Retrospect: Bloody Disgusting's Top 20 Films of the Decade...Part 4". Bloody Disgusting. Archived from the original on April 28, 2025.
  66. Collis, Clark (October 5, 2020). "Why Session 9 is the scariest film you can watch this Halloween". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on November 27, 2020.
  67. Knollwood, Johnny (October 29, 2021). "Stephen Gevedon Talks "Session 9" Fan Theories, a Review of "The Last Thing Mary Saw" + More from Brooklyn Horror Film Festival". The New School Free Press. Archived from the original on June 3, 2025.
  68. Leighton, Susan (September 26, 2017). "Stephen Gevedon: The 'Session 9' Retrospective Interview". 1428 Elm. Archived from the original on December 13, 2025.
  69. 1 2 Mirabal, Marisa (August 11, 2021). "'Session 9' Writers And Director Brad Anderson And Stephen Gevedon Have A Prequel In Mind". /Film. Archived from the original on May 20, 2025.
  70. Bramesco, Charles; Vuckovic, Jovanka; Zimmerman, Sam; Tobias, Scott; Murray, Noel; Grierson, Tim; Adams, Sam; Fear, David; Grow, Kory; Collins, Sean T.; Epstein, Dan (June 10, 2021). "65 Greatest Horror Movies of the 21st Century". Rolling Stone Australia. Archived from the original on December 3, 2023.
  71. Muir 2023, p. 144.
  72. Hamman, Cody (August 16, 2024). "Brad Anderson horror film Session 9 is getting the novelization treatment this October". JoBlo.com. Archived from the original on December 4, 2024.
  73. DiVincenzo, Alex (March 26, 2025). "Official 'Session 9' Novelization Available Now from Echo On Publications". Bloody Disgusting. Archived from the original on January 28, 2026.

Sources

edit
edit