Pipli (Odia: Pipilipattan), also spelled Pipely, was a major port town at the river mouth of the Subarnarekha River during the colonization of India.

Pipli
Pipilipattan
Satellite imagery of the Subarnarekha River
Pipli is located in India
Pipli
Pipli
Location of the site in India
Alternative namePipely
LocationNear present-day Kirtania Port, Odisha, India
Coordinates21°33′51″N 87°20′11″E / 21.56417°N 87.33639°E / 21.56417; 87.33639
TypePort city
History
Abandoned19th century

It hosted major European factories and was a great center of commerce in the 17th century. However, due to siltation, it lost its importance, as ships were unable to anchor there.

History

edit

Pre-European history

edit

Prior to the European presence, Pipli was a trade center for Indian merchants, who traded extensively with the Malayo-Indonesian islands. As such, in the 15th century, Malacca's supply of textiles partially came from Pipli.[1]

In the 16th century, Indian merchants from Pipli travelled as far as Banten, Pegu, Tenasserim, and Achin, and even to the Red Sea ports of Aden and Jeddah.[1]

European presence

edit

Following the Mughal conquest of Odisha in 1593, Pipli's importance grew, bringing it into direct contact with European traders.[1]

Portuguese

edit

The Portuguese became the first Europeans,[2][3] establishing their first factory there in 1514,[2][3] giving them a monopoly for more than one hundred years,[4][3] between 1514 and 1615.[5] This made Pipli a great center of Portuguese trade, being mentioned in 1633 as the old rendezvous of the Portuguese.[5] This was exacerbated in the early 17th century, when the Portuguese repositioned their trade from San Thomé to Pipli.[3] Here, they bought many kinds of white cotton,[5] textiles, gingelly (sesame), butter, and other commodities,[6][3] shipping them to Macao.[7]

In 1636, the Portuguese obtained permission from the Nawab of Odisha, Mutaqad Khan, to establish an additional residence in the city;[5] however, they had to abandon the port in the latter half of the 17th century.[8]

Dutch

edit

The Dutch ended the Portuguese monopoly with their arrival at Pipli; however, the date of their arrival is disputed. Despite it traditionally being dated to 1625, modern research shows that their arrival took place in 1627. Nonetheless, in 1637, the Dutch withdrew their trade from Hooghly to here, where they obtained permission to trade from the Mughal emperor, Shah Jahan. Subsequently, the Dutch trade profited from their factory,[5] where the Dutch shipped 2,000 tonnes (2,200 short tons) of saltpeter annually[8] in the 1650s.[5][9] Despite this, the Dutch abandoned their factory in the city in 1676, destroying it along the way.[8][5]

English

edit

Like the Dutch and later the French, the English also entered Pipli for maritime trade.[8][3] In July 1631, an English voyage to Pipli was undertaken to open trade there.[7] The English factory there continued until 1723.[3] At the end of the 19th century, Pipli became too unprofitable for the British Raj to develop.[10]

Apart from the abovementioned, Pipli also hosted the French and Danes.[3] Because of the European activity, Pipli grew into an important commercial and maritime center,[1] with Alexander Hamilton describing the city as a great center of trade in the 17th century.[8][3] Meanwhile, the Indian merchants were still actively trading regionally.

The abandonment of the Europeans in the latter half of the 17th century was due to the formation of sandbanks[11] and sediment pollution,[11][12] which made the river mouth of the Subarnarekha River unsuitable for ships to anchor.[12] Over time, this took away the commercial advantages of the port,[12] causing the port to lose its importance.[13][12] Furthermore, river flooding from the Subarnerkha River washed away the remnants of the port city.[10]

Notes and citations

edit

Notes

edit

Citations

edit
  1. 1 2 3 4 Shaheen 2023, p. 11.
  2. 1 2 Shaheen 2023, pp. 11–12.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Tripati, Patnaik & Acharya 2014, p. 66.
  4. Tripati & Unnikrishnan 2011, pp. 305–306.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Shaheen 2023, p. 12.
  6. Shaheen 2023, pp. 12–13.
  7. 1 2 Shaheen 2023, p. 13.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Tripati & Unnikrishnan 2011, p. 306.
  9. Tripati, Patnaik & Acharya 2014, pp. 66–67.
  10. 1 2 Tripati & Unnikrishnan 2011, p. 307.
  11. 1 2 Tripati & Unnikrishnan 2011, pp. 306–307, 310.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Shaheen 2023, p. 16.
  13. Tripati & Unnikrishnan 2011, p. 307, 310.

Works cited

edit