November 2008 San Francisco general election

The November 2008 San Francisco general elections were held on November 4, 2008, in San Francisco, California. The elections included seven seats to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, one seat to the San Francisco County Superior Court, and twenty-two San Francisco ballot measures.[1]

Board of Supervisors

edit

Superior Court

edit
San Francisco County Superior Court Seat 12 election
Candidate Votes %
Gerardo Sandoval 156,227 53.50
Thomas Mellon (incumbent) 134,339 46.00
Write-in 1,449 0.50
Invalid or blank votes 96,097 24.76
Total votes 388,112 100.00
Turnout {{{votes}}} 81.25%

Propositions

edit
Propositions: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUV
Note: "City" refers to the San Francisco municipal government.

Proposition A

edit

Proposition A would authorize the city to issue $887.4 million in bonds to rebuild and improve San Francisco General Hospital. This proposition required a two-thirds majority to pass.

Proposition A
ChoiceVotes%
For300,59583.81
Against58,04916.19
Required majority66.67
Total358,644100.00
Valid votes358,64494.01
Invalid/blank votes22,8515.99
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition B

edit

Proposition B would establish an Affordable Housing Fund to acquire new affordable housing, funded by setting aside a portion of property taxes.

Proposition B
ChoiceVotes%
For166,29947.81
Against181,53452.19
Total347,833100.00
Valid votes347,83391.18
Invalid/blank votes33,6628.82
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition C

edit

Proposition C would prohibit City employees from serving on most Charter-created boards and commissions.

Proposition C
ChoiceVotes%
For124,39538.06
Against202,41961.94
Total326,814100.00
Valid votes326,81485.67
Invalid/blank votes54,68114.33
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition D

edit

Proposition D would allocate funds from new hotel and payroll expense tax revenues toward developing Pier 70, on the Central Waterfront, if a financial and land use plan is approved by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.

Proposition D
ChoiceVotes%
For226,51368.07
Against106,22831.93
Total332,741100.00
Valid votes332,74187.22
Invalid/blank votes48,75412.78
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition E

edit

Proposition E would change the number of signatures needed to recall city officials from a fixed 10% of registered voters to a scale of from 10% to 15% based on population.

Proposition E
ChoiceVotes%
For195,60560.10
Against129,86239.90
Total325,467100.00
Valid votes325,46785.31
Invalid/blank votes56,02814.69
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition F

edit

Proposition F would shift City elections of some citywide offices from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years after November 2011.

Proposition F
ChoiceVotes%
For144,59245.00
Against176,69255.00
Total321,284100.00
Valid votes321,28484.22
Invalid/blank votes60,21115.78
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition G

edit

Proposition G would "allow City employees to purchase retirement system credit for unpaid parental leave taken before July 1, 2003, as long as the purchase price covers all city costs."

Proposition G
ChoiceVotes%
For202,01162.47
Against121,35437.53
Total323,365100.00
Valid votes323,36584.76
Invalid/blank votes58,13015.24
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition H

edit

Proposition H would establish public power in San Francisco, allowing the city to purchase public utilities, establishing deadlines on alternative energy use, allowing the City Public Utilities Commission to set rates, and allowing the Board of Supervisors to issue public utility bonds without voter approval.

Proposition H
ChoiceVotes%
For133,21438.62
Against211,68161.38
Total344,895100.00
Valid votes344,89590.41
Invalid/blank votes36,6009.59
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition I

edit

Proposition I would create the Office of Independent Ratepayer Advocate to recommend public utility rates to the City Public Utilities Commission.

Proposition I
ChoiceVotes%
For117,05036.71
Against201,81163.29
Total318,861100.00
Valid votes318,86183.58
Invalid/blank votes62,63416.42
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition J

edit

Proposition J would create a Historic Preservation Commission and allow it to make decisions regarding historic preservation in the city.

Proposition J
ChoiceVotes%
For183,37255.64
Against146,19444.36
Total329,566100.00
Valid votes329,56686.39
Invalid/blank votes51,92913.61
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition K

edit

Proposition K would decriminalize prostitution, enforce laws against crimes on sex workers, and disclose all investigations and prosecutions of violent crimes against sex workers.

Proposition K
ChoiceVotes%
For140,18540.94
Against202,23559.06
Total342,420100.00
Valid votes342,42089.76
Invalid/blank votes39,07510.24
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition L

edit

Proposition L would ensure first-year funding, furnish leased space, and define the scope and operations of the Community Justice Center.

Proposition L
ChoiceVotes%
For132,09742.54
Against178,44057.46
Total310,537100.00
Valid votes310,53781.40
Invalid/blank votes70,95818.60
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition M

edit

Proposition M would prohibit landlords from engaging in specific acts of tenant harassment and allow such enforcement by court orders, rent reduction, monetary awards, and criminal penalties.

Proposition M
ChoiceVotes%
For195,02358.84
Against136,41641.16
Total331,439100.00
Valid votes331,43986.88
Invalid/blank votes50,05613.12
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition N

edit

Proposition N would increase the transfer tax on properties worth $5 million or up to 1.5% and reduce the tax on residences that install solar energy systems or make seismic upgrades.

Proposition N
ChoiceVotes%
For223,80868.56
Against102,62131.44
Total326,429100.00
Valid votes326,42985.57
Invalid/blank votes55,06614.43
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition O

edit

Proposition O would replace the Emergency Response Fee with a functionally equivalent Access Line Tax and revise the Telephone Users Tax.

Proposition O
ChoiceVotes%
For208,04466.74
Against103,67933.26
Total311,723100.00
Valid votes311,72381.71
Invalid/blank votes69,77218.29
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition P

edit

Proposition P would change the size and composition of the San Francisco Transportation Authority Board from the entire Board of Supervisors to one consisting of the Mayor, the President of the Board of Supervisors, an elected City official selected by the Mayor, an elected City official selected by the President of the Board of Supervisors, and the Treasurer, and encourage the Authority to obtain expert financial review of its budgets and adopt City ethics and public records laws.

Proposition P
ChoiceVotes%
For101,23032.99
Against205,66567.01
Total306,895100.00
Valid votes306,89580.45
Invalid/blank votes74,60019.55
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition Q

edit

Proposition Q would include more partnerships and businesses to be subject under the payroll expense tax and expand the tax exemption to businesses that have annual payroll expenses of $250,000 or less.

Proposition Q
ChoiceVotes%
For233,41174.20
Against81,17825.80
Total314,589100.00
Valid votes314,58982.46
Invalid/blank votes66,90617.54
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition R

edit

Proposition R would rename the Oceanside Water Pollution Control Plant to the George W. Bush Sewage Plant.

Proposition R
ChoiceVotes%
For101,37630.25
Against233,73369.75
Total335,109100.00
Valid votes335,10987.84
Invalid/blank votes46,38612.16
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition S

edit

Proposition S would make it City policy that voters will not approve new set-asides of City revenue that do not identify a new funding source, limit annual increases, and expire in ten years.

Proposition S
ChoiceVotes%
For167,97455.66
Against133,81744.34
Total301,791100.00
Valid votes301,79179.11
Invalid/blank votes79,70420.89
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition T

edit

Proposition T would mandate the city to maintain funding for and provide enough free and low-cost substance abuse treatment services to meet demand.

Proposition T
ChoiceVotes%
For200,64961.24
Against127,01438.76
Total327,663100.00
Valid votes327,66385.89
Invalid/blank votes53,83214.11
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition U

edit

Proposition U would make it City policy that representatives and senators in the United States Congress vote against further funding for deploying troops to Iraq, except for funds to withdraw such troops.

Proposition U
ChoiceVotes%
For193,40759.25
Against133,00240.75
Total326,409100.00
Valid votes326,40985.56
Invalid/blank votes55,08614.44
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

Proposition V

edit

Proposition V would make it City policy to urge the San Francisco Board of Education to reverse its elimination of the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps (JROTC).

Proposition V
ChoiceVotes%
For179,63954.63
Against149,16945.37
Total328,808100.00
Valid votes328,80886.19
Invalid/blank votes52,68713.81
Total votes381,495100.00
Registered voters/turnout81.25

References

edit
  1. "November 4, 2008 Final Election Results". SF Elections. Retrieved March 15, 2025.
edit