Netunceliyan, was an early Pandya king. Netunceliyan was known by the title Āriyappaṭai-kaṭanta Neṭuñceḻiyaṉ (he who won a victory against an Aryan army). He is a character in Ilango Adigal's Cilappatikaram, one of the Five Great Epics in Tamil literature.[4]

Netunceliyan
Āriyappaṭai-kaṭanta Neṭuñceḻiyaṉ
(lit., he who won a victory against an Aryan army)[1]
Kannagi asking for justice in the court of Netunceliyan, a scene from the Cilappatikaram
Pandyan Ruler
Reign270 BCE[2]
SuccessorVetrivēl Seliyan[3]
SpouseKopperundevi
IssueVetrivēl Seliyan
HousePandyan

Literature

edit

The Cilappatikāram's Katturaikadai canto mentions Neduncheziyan's victory over Aryans:

[...] These and many other things, illustrative of the unmatched rule of righteousness of the Pandyan Neduncheziyan, who vanquished the army of the northern Aryas, and established peace in the southern Tamil country [...]

Cilappatikāram, Book II: Maduraikkāndam, Canto XXIII: Katturaikādai[5]

Netunceliyan thus appears in Cilappatikaram, which describes the tragic story of Kannagi and Kovalan.[6][7] It is attributed to Ilango Adigal, a Chera prince turned monk, and was probably composed between the 2nd and the 6th centuries CE.[8][9]

The first part of Cilappatikāram describes the city of Puhar in the Chola Empire, where the pair of Kovalan and Kannagi reside. After Kovalan loses his wealth through his illicit relationship with the dancer Madhavi, he returns to Kannagi and the couple decide to move to Madurai in the Pandya Empire. The Pandyas are led by king Neduncheziyan and his wife Kopperundevi.[10]

When Kovalan attempts to sell one of the two anklets of Kannagi to raise money, the royal goldsmith, who had earlier stolen an anklet belonging to the queen Kopperundevi, finds the that anklets are similar, and falsely accuses Kovalan of stealing the queen’s anklet. Enraged by the act, the king Neduncheziyan orders Kovalan’s arrest and execution without a fair trial.[11] After Kovalan is executed, Kannagi appears in the royal court, trying to prove her husband’s innocence and demanding justice. She breaks open her remaining anklet to reveal that her anklet contained rubies whereas queen Kopperundevi's missing anklet contained pearls. When the king realises the truth and his mistake, he kills himself due to remorse.[12]


Archaeological evidence

edit
Tamil-Brahmi inscription from Mangulam, dated to the era of Netunceliyan

According to Iravatham Mahadevan, the Tamil Brahmi inscriptions discovered at Mangulam, possibly mentions the Pandyan king Netunceliyan.[13][14][15] He is titled as Āriyappaṭai-kaṭanta Neṭuñceḻiyaṉ (Netunceliyan who defeated the Aryans), signifiying his defeat of the Aryans.[16]

edit

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. Sastri, K. A. Nilakanta (1955). A History of South India. Oxford University Press. p. 121. Retrieved 26 April 2026.
  2. Ashok, Sowmiya (2025). The Dig: Keeladi and the Politics of India’s Past. John Murray India. p. 170.
  3. Dikshitar, V. R. Ramachandra (1939). The Silappadikaram. Oxford University Press. p. 309. Retrieved 26 April 2026.
  4. Sastri, K. A. Nilakanta (1955). A History of South India. Oxford University Press. p. 121. Retrieved 26 April 2026.
  5. Dikshitar, V. R. Ramachandra (1939). The Silappadikaram. Oxford University Press. p. 271. Retrieved 26 April 2026.
  6. Zvelebil 1973, p. 174–175.
  7. Pollock 2003, p. 296–298.
  8. Sastri 2002, p. 397.
  9. Alain Danielou 1965, p. viii.
  10. Parthasarathy 1993, p. 73–90.
  11. Dikshitar 1939, p. 217–221. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFDikshitar1939 (help)
  12. Dikshitar 1939, p. 247–251. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFDikshitar1939 (help)
  13. Mahadevan 2003, p. 43.
  14. Umamaheshwari 2018, p. 43.
  15. Ashok, Sowmiya (23 December 2025). The Dig: Keeladi and the Politics of India’s Past. Hachette India. ISBN 978-93-5731-853-2.
  16. Kavitha, S. S. (19 September 2012). "About a secular past". The Hindu.

Bibliography

edit