A military government is any government that is administered by a military, whether or not this government is legal under the laws of the jurisdiction at issue or by an occupying power. It is usually administered by military personnel.

World's states colored by systems of government:

Military occupation

edit

Military occupation, also called belligerent occupation or simply occupation, is temporary hostile control exerted by a ruling power's military apparatus over a sovereign territory that is outside the legal boundaries of that ruling power's own sovereign territory.[1][2][3][4] The controlled territory is called occupied territory, and the ruling power is called the occupant.[5] Occupation's intended temporary nature distinguishes it from annexation and colonialism.[4][6] The occupant often establishes military rule to facilitate administration of the occupied territory, though this is not a necessary characteristic of occupation.[7]

Martial law

edit
Martial law
Tanks during the imposition of martial law in Poland, December 1981
Dunmore's Proclamation declaring martial law in the Colony of Virginia on 7 November 1775

Martial law is the replacement of civilian government by military rule and the suspension of civilian legal processes for military powers.[8][9] Martial law can continue for a specified amount of time, or indefinitely, and standard civil liberties may be suspended for as long as martial law continues.[8][10] Most often, martial law is declared in times of war or emergencies such as civil unrest and natural disasters.[11] Alternatively, martial law may be declared in instances of military coups d'état.[12]

Military dictatorship

edit

A military dictatorship is a type of dictatorship where supreme power is held and exercised by a member of the armed forces. Military dictatorships are usually led by the commander-in-chief of the military or the leading figure in military junta. They are most often formed by military coups or by the empowerment of the military through a popular uprising in times of domestic unrest or instability. The military nominally seeks power to restore order or fight corruption, but the personal motivations of military officers will vary.[13]

Modern military dictatorship developed in Latin America during the 19th century, and it expanded in Europe during the early-20th century.[14] It saw a resurgence during the Cold War, and new military dictatorships were established in Africa, Asia, and Latin America in the 1960s.[15] Some scholars have asserted that the number of military dictatorships has declined since the end of the Cold War.[16]

Military junta

edit
The Chilean military junta, led by Augusto Pinochet in March 1986

A military junta (/ˈhʊntə, ˈʌntə/) is a system of government led by a committee of military leaders. The term junta means "meeting" or "committee" and originated in the national and local junta organized by the Spanish resistance to Napoleon's invasion of Spain in 1808.[17] The term is now used to refer to an authoritarian form of government characterized by a politically dominant group of military officers.[18]

Stratocracy

edit
Portrait of Robert Filmer, the first person to use the term stratocracy in English[19]

A stratocracy is a form of government headed by military chiefs.[20] The branches of government are administered by military forces, the government is legal under the laws of the jurisdiction at issue, and is usually carried out by military workers.[21]

Military democracy

edit

A military democracy is a war-based society that practices democracy. The category is often applied to historical peoples. An example is Frederick Engels' characterization:

"The military commander, the council, and the popular assembly formed the organs of military democracy, military because war and the organization of war were now the regular functions of life of the people. The wealth of their neighbors excited the greed of the peoples, who began to regard acquisition of wealth as one of the main purposes in life. They were barbarians: plunder appeared to them easier and even more honorable than productive work. War, once waged simply to avenge aggression or as a means of enlarging territory that had become inadequate, was now waged for the sake of plunder alone, and became a regular profession. . . . The growth of slavery had already begun to brand working for a living as slavish and more ignominious than engaging in plunder."[22]

According to Engels, the Greek Heroic Age was a typical example of military democracy.[22] Lewis Henry Morgan spoke of two features: "the military state of society, and the system of administration consisting of an elective and removable supreme chief, a council of elders and a popular assembly."[23]


References

edit
  1. Bracka, J. (2021). Transitional Justice for Israel/Palestine: Truth-Telling and Empathy in Ongoing Conflict. Springer series in transitional justice. Springer International Publishing AG. ISBN 978-3-030-89435-1. Today, the widely accepted definition of occupation is 'the effective control of a power (be it one or more states or an international organization, such as the United Nations) over a territory to which that power has no sovereign title, without the volition of the sovereign of that territory.'
  2. Roberts, Adam (1990). "Prolonged Military Occupation: The Israeli-Occupied Territories Since 1967". American Journal of International Law. 84 (1). Cambridge University Press (CUP): 44–103. doi:10.2307/2203016. ISSN 0002-9300. JSTOR 2203016. S2CID 145514740.
  3. Eyal Benvenisti. The international law of occupation. Princeton University Press, 2004. ISBN 978-0-691-12130-7, p. 43.
  4. 1 2 Edelstein, David M. (2004). "Occupational Hazards: Why Military Occupations Succeed or Fail". International Security. 29 (1): 52. doi:10.1162/0162288041762913. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 4137547. S2CID 57571525. The intended temporary duration of occupation distinguishes it from both annexation and colonialism.
  5. Fabre, Cécile. "Living with the enemy: the ethics of belligerent occupation" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 November 2018. Retrieved 30 November 2018.
  6. Stirk, Peter (2009). The Politics of Military Occupation. Edinburgh University Press. p. 44. ISBN 9780748636716. The significance of the temporary nature of military occupation is that it brings about no change of allegiance. Military government remains an alien government whether of short or long duration, though prolonged occupation may encourage the occupying power to change military occupation into something else, namely annexation.
  7. Roberts, Adam (1985). "What is a Military Occupation?". British Yearbook of International Law. 55: 249–305. doi:10.1093/bybil/55.1.249.
  8. 1 2 "Martial law". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 30 March 2023.
  9. Stewart, Anya (2026). "Defining martial law: Introducing the EmPower dataset". Conflict Management and Peace Science 07388942251410770. doi:10.1177/07388942251410770. ISSN 0738-8942.
  10. "What Is Martial Law? Meaning, History In the U.S., and Example". Investopedia. Retrieved 30 March 2023.
  11. "martial law". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 30 March 2023.
  12. Lieber, Francis and Lieber, G. Norman. To Save the Country: A Lost Treatise on Martial Law. Edited by Will Smiley and John Fabian Witt, Yale University Press, 2019. JSTOR, doi:10.2307/j.ctvk8vz1h. Accessed 30 March 2023.
  13. Geddes, Frantz & Wright 2014.
  14. Prieto, Moisés (19 September 2021). Dictatorship in the Nineteenth Century: Conceptualisations, Experiences, Transfers. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-000-43708-9.
  15. Abrahamsen 2018, p. 24.
  16. Danopoulos 1988.
  17. Junta, Encyclopædia Britannica (last updated 1998).
  18. Geddes, Barbara; Frantz, Erica; Wright, Joseph G. (2014). "Military Rule". Annual Review of Political Science. 17: 147–162. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-213418.
  19. Cite error: The named reference Blackford 1956 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  20. Bouvier, John; Gleason, Daniel A. (1999) [1851]. Institutes of American law. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-886363-80-9.
  21. de Grazia (1970).
  22. 1 2 Otto Maenchen-Helfen (1973). The World of the Huns: Studies in Their History and Culture. University of California Press. pp. 191–. ISBN 978-0-520-01596-8.
  23. Yu. Bromley (1 January 1974). Soviet Ethnology and Anthropology Today. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 134–. ISBN 978-3-11-085653-8.