Marie Françoise Victoire Salmon (c.1760[a] – 2 May 1827) was a French domestic servant in the Kingdom of France who was wrongfully convicted of fatally poisoning her employer and was condemned to be tortured and burned alive in 1782. After narrowly avoiding execution, she was fully acquitted of all charges in 1786 with the help of the lawyers Pierre Noël Lecauchois and Jean-François Fournel, who argued her innocence through a series of widely-circulated legal briefs that exposed a flawed criminal investigation and garnered public sympathy and support.

Marie Salmon
Portrait of Marie Salmon in 1786
Portrait of Marie Salmon in 1786
Born
Marie Françoise Victoire Salmon

c.1760[a]
Méautis, Normandy, Kingdom of France
Died2 May 1827(1827-05-02) (aged 67)
OccupationDomestic servant
Known forWrongful poisoning conviction and exoneration

Salmon's exoneration was celebrated throughout France, elevating her to a celebrity status and earning her invitations from high society, including from Queen consort Marie Antoinette and Madame de Genlis. Her story became a popular symbol of the harsh and unfair criminal justice system of the ancien régime.

Early life

edit

Born in 1760,[a] Marie François Victoire Salmon was the daughter of a day laborer in Méautis, Normandy.[1] When she was young, a pig attacked her and permanently disabled her left hand, leaving her unable to fully open that hand. After her mother died and her father remarried, she left home at 15 to seek employment as a domestic servant.[2]

In 1781, a parish priest attempted to rape Salmon; he was caught and convicted, but quickly released. A magistrate named Roland Revel de Bretteville, who knew her through her employer, suggested that she protect herself from the priest by moving to Caen, where he offered her a job in his household.[3] However, Salmon believed that Revel was trying to seduce her, so she found work as a domestic servant for the Huet-Duparc family in Caen instead.[4]

Poisoning incidents

edit

Death of Paysant de Beaulieu

edit

The Huet-Duparcs were a petit-bourgeois family consisting of Madame Duparc, her husband, three children, and two grandparents.[5] Salmon's duties for the household included preparing simple porridge meals for the 88-year old grandfather, Paysant de Beaulieu.[6] According to Salmon, Madame Duparc gave her specific instructions for preparing Beaulieu's meals. However, on 6 August 1781, after Salmon had only been employed for 5 days, Madame Duparc interrupted Salmon's meal preparations and sprinkled salt into Beaulieu's porridge, even though Duparc had previously told her to never add salt.[7]

Within hours of eating his porridge, Beaulieu became violently ill, vomiting and convulsing.[8] Salmon sat by his sick bed and cared for him as he continued to worsen, while Madame Duparc told her son to ride out of town to inform his father of Beaulieu's condition.[9] Beaulieu died that same evening on 6 August 1781.[10]

Second poisoning and arrest

edit

The following day on 7 August, while Salmon completed her duties and rested, Madame Duparc and her daughter prepared two separate soups: one for the family made with fresh broth and the other for Salmon and the housekeeper made from the previous day's broth.[11] Later, Salmon helped serve the soup with new broth to the Huet-Duparc family and their dinner guests, and then she went to the kitchen to eat her own bowl.[12]

Shortly after eating their soup, the Huet-Duparcs and their guests complained of stomach pains, and Madame Duparc declared that she smelled burnt arsenic in the kitchen. People became frantic, with a guest crying out "NOUS SOMMES TOUS EMPOISONNÉS!" [emphasis in source] (transl."We are all poisoned!")[13]

News spread throughout the city, and neighbors gathered at the Huet-Duparc home to investigate the commotion.[14] After seeing the frenzied state of the Huet-Duparc family, who continued to insist that they had been poisoned, observers called for the authorities to arrest Salmon.[15]

Conviction and delayed execution

edit

The Procureur du Roi (transl.King's Prosecutor) in the baillage court of Caen, Roland Revel de Bretteville, whom Salmon had left a few weeks earlier after she had declined his assistance, was assigned to investigate the case. After conducting what would later be argued was a prejudiced and flawed investigation fueled by personal animus, Revel sought the death penalty for Salmon.[3]

A drawing of Marie Salmon marching to her execution from Histoire des bagnes (1878) by Pierre Zaccone.
A drawing of Marie Salmon marching to her execution from Histoire des bagnes (1878) by Pierre Zaccone.[16]

On 18 April 1782, the baillage court of Caen found Salmon guilty of poisoning, murder, and theft.[17] She was "condemned to be tortured for the names of possible accomplices, to beg forgiveness in public barefoot and carrying a torch, and to be burned at the stake."[17] The Parlement of Rouen upheld the conviction.[18] The execution would take place in Saint Sauveur square.[10] Around this time, Father François Lambert heard Salmon's religious confession and believed she was innocent. Time was short, so Lambert told her to claim she was pregnant in order to delay her execution.[18]

On 30 May 1782, the day of her execution, Salmon suddenly fainted and then declared she was pregnant.[19] The execution was delayed while two midwives were summoned to examine her.[20] However, because the midwives could not definitively determine if she was pregnant at that time, Salmon's execution was further postponed for two months, as the criminal code of the ancien régime stipulated that the execution of a pregnant woman should be delayed until after the birth of her child.[21]

During this delay, Lambert and another confessor wrote to a regionally famous lawyer from Rouen named Pierre Noël Lecauchois, asking him to reexamine her case.[22] Lecauchois took on the case, along with his Parisian colleague Jean-François Fournel, and immediately instructed Salmon's confessors to file an official request to review the trial.[20] He then obtained a stay of execution on Salmon's behalf; however, due to delays in transferring documents, news of the court order did reach Caen until a few days before she was scheduled to be killed.[19]

Retrial and exoneration

edit

Strategy

edit
Engraving of Pierre Noël Lecauchois by Cathelin and Noireterre.
Engraving of Pierre Noël Lecauchois by Cathelin and Noireterre. The names of those he freed are written below his portrait, including Marie Salmon, referred to as "le jeune Salmon 1786."

As part of their efforts to reverse Salmon's conviction, Salmon's lawyers Lecauchois and Fournel wrote three mémoires judiciaires (transl.legal briefs) to argue Salmon's innocence and published them for the general public. Lecauchois wrote Justification de Marie-Françoise-Victoire Salmon and Addition à la Justification de Marie-Françoise-Victoire Salmon, and Fournel wrote Consultation pour une jeune fille condamnée à être brûlée vive. The briefs were printed by Parisian publisher André-Charles Cailleau.[23]

Lecauchois opened Justification by recalling past victims of the unjust criminal code:[24]

Ghosts of LeBrun, of the Danglades and Forrés, join that of the unfortunate Calas. ...Bring forth your grief-stricken, ruined families, uncover your bloody-corpses, some cruelly mangled by torture and mutilated on the gallows, others crushed with blows, crawling, expiring on the galleys.

Pierre Noël Lecauchois (1786), as translated by Sarah Maza

The lawyers' goal in circulating these legal briefs was to sway public opinion in support of Salmon's innocence while also connecting her unjust victimization by the criminal justice system to the broader movement for judicial reforms at the time.[25] In their briefs, they presented the rules of evidence and judicial process, challenging their audience of laypersons to judge the circumstances for themselves, while also providing an emotionally compelling first-person narrative from Salmon's perspective to "play up [her] candor and vulnerability."[26] As Salmon narrates her story, "the reader is not allowed to forget for long that she is young, tender-hearted, and easily alluring."[27]

Arguments

edit

Prejudiced investigation

edit
An engraving prepared for Madame de Genlis that dramatizes the court's recognition of Marie Salmon's innocence.
In an engraving prepared for Madame de Genlis that dramatizes the court's recognition of Marie Salmon's innocence, Salmon stands beside her lawyers with her hands clasped in prayer, as they speak to a rapt gallery.[28]

Both Lecauchois and Fournel raised issues with the investigation conducted by the prosecutor Roland Revel de Bretteville.[29] In Justification, Lecauchois accused Revel of deliberately conducting a hasty and flawed investigation.[3] Lecauchois argued that Revel collected evidence days after the alleged crime, placed unfair weight on Madame Duparc's testimony against Salmon, neglected to interview key persons of interest such as Madame Duparc's son, and did not consider testimonies that Salmon provided in her own defense.[30]

In Consultation, Fournel described the past relationship that Revel had with Salmon shortly before her employment at the Huet-Duparc household, in which Revel tried to persuade her to move to Caen. According to Fournel, Revel held a deep grudge against Salmon after she had declined his invitation:[31]

Ce même sieur Revel, changé tout-à-coup en adversaire implacable, attiser lui-même le bûcher qui devoit consumer son ancienne protégée : onne pourra méconnoître [sic] le caractère d'un ressentiment aussi profond que secret.

This same Mr. Revel suddenly transformed into a relentless adversary, stoking the pyre that was to consume his former protégée. One cannot fail to recognize the character of a resentment as profound as it was secret.

Jean-François Fournel (1786)

While Fournel alludes to the "secret" nature of Revel's profound resentment by describing Salmon's beauty and youthfulness alongside Revel's initial "effusion" of benevolence,[31] modern historians Hans-Jürgen Lüsebrink [de] and Sarah Maza state it plainly: Revel felt spurned after Salmon rejected his sexual advances.[4]

Lack of evidence or motive

edit

Lecauchois argued that the police, surgeon, and lawyer who arrived at the Huet-Duparc home to investigate Beaulieu's death readily accepted the Huet-Duparc family's accusations against Salmon and possibly even planted evidence against her.[32] In one example, Lecauchois pointed out that when Salmon was searched, a shiny white substance, believed to be poison, was found in her left pocket, but, notably, she never used that pocket because her left hand had been disabled since childhood, when she was attacked by a pig.[33] In Consultation, Fournel directly accused the Duparc family of framing Salmon for the murder of Beaulieu.[34]

Lecauchois also argued that Salmon did not have any motive to poison Beaulieu or anyone in the Huet-Duparc household. He noted that she did not know the Huet-Duparc family prior to working for them, and she had only spoken highly of her employment in the household prior to the Beaulieu's sudden illness and death.[35] Furthermore, he pointed out that she maintained the composure of an innocent person by quickly consenting to searches and agreeing to appear before the king's prosecutor.[36] The Huet-Duparc family, by comparison, behaved very differently. According to Salmon, the family did not grieve for Beaulieu; rather, they seemed "relieved" that he was dead.[32]

Acquittal

edit

Lecauchois and Fournel's arguments were successful in winning Salmon's freedom.[37] On 23 May 1786, after over four years in prison, Salmon was fully acquitted of all charges.[10] A large crowd waited outside the gates of Palais de Justice in Paris to cheer for Salmon and her lawyers Lecauchois and Fournel as they emerged.[37] Witness and chronicler Siméon-Prosper Hardy wrote that "Toutes les personnes qui assistent à cette scène attendrissante, ont peine à contenir leurs larmes de joie" (transl."Everyone who witnessed this touching scene could barely hold back tears of joy").[38]

Afterwards, Salmon and Lecauchois had dinner at the home of their printer André-Charles Cailleau. Hardy went to Cailleau's home and wrote that he witnessed crowds gathered in the street outside to watch Salmon through the first-floor windows.[39]

Freedom and fame

edit

Nobility and celebrities

edit
A fan with illustrations of Marie Salmon and Lecauchois on one side, and Cagliostro on the other.
A fan celebrating l'Innocence reconnue of Marie Salmon. She is pictured on the left side of the fan, washing her hands in a basin held by a putto, while another putto places a laurel wreath on her head. Her lawyer Lecauchois stands behind her. Cagliostro is pictured opposite of them on the fan.

In the months following Salmon's exoneration, she and Lecauchois were invited to meet with nobility and celebrities, who bestowed generous gifts.[40] King Louis XVI and Queen consort Marie Antionette held a private audience with Salmon and Lecauchois, in which they presented Salmon with a valuable wallet of coins.[41] Hardy wrote that the gift from the royal couple included 25 Louis d'or and a lifetime pension of 300 livres.[42] Salmon also received a sum of money from the Archbishop of Paris.[42]

Salmon and her lawyer also met Madame de Genlis and the princes of the House of Orléans. Lecauchois was so moved by their meeting that he published a manuscript entitled Détail sur la fille Salmon (transl.Detail about the Salmon girl) describing the scene.[43] He wrote that Genlis and Salmon's arms were intertwined on the couch as the princes hugged and kissed Salmon, and he lamented that he could not capture the moment in a painting.[44] Lecauchois shared a note he received from Genlis:[45]

Je vous supplie de dire à Marie Salmon qu'elle a laissé dans mon cœur une impression profonde ; et que je goûterai un bonheur inexprimable, en contribuant à la dédommager des maux affreux qu'elle a soufferts.

I beg you to tell Marie Salmon that she has left a deep impression on my heart; and that I will feel immense happiness by helping to compensate her for the terrible suffering she has endured.

Madame de Genlis in a letter to Pierre Noël Lecauchois (1786)

In his Détail sur la fille Salmon, Lecauchois also wrote about an audience with Alessandro Cagliostro,[46] the same Italian charlatan and occultist who was imprisoned in the Bastille after the Affair of the Diamond Necklace, though for unrelated reasons.[47] Cagliostro offered his portrait miniature as a gift to Salmon, and he promised that he would have Lecauchois' legal briefs about Salmon's case translated into English when he travelled to London.[46][b]

Public appearances

edit

On 8 June, Salmon and Lecauchois were invited to performances at the Comédie Française and were directed to sit in the balcony, where they were applauded by the actors and audience.[48]

An August 1786 edition of Journal encyclopédique [fr] featured a story about "un trait de bienfaisance" (transl.benevolent act) by Salmon. While Salmon was in prison, she had befriended a woman who was imprisoned with her 20-month-old child, and, when that woman died, Salmon continued to care for the child inside the prison. After she was acquitted, Salmon and Lecauchois took the child to the Hôpital des Enfants-Trouvés and asked the priests to care for him there.[49] The child was baptized and named Pierre Noël Daniel Innocent Moreau[42] in a ceremony before 1,200 people.[49]

Tributes

edit
Portrait engraving of Marie Salmon entitled "L'INNOCENCE RECONNUE"
One of many engravings of Marie Salmon that were circulated in France after her exoneration.

Tributes in the form of engravings circulated in periodicals throughout France, celebrating Salmon's exoneration as "L'INNOCENCE RECONNUE" (transl.Innocence Recognized).[41]

Other art forms honoring Salmon, including numerous songs, became popular with the illiterate Parisian public.[41] The French libretist and actor Desforges wrote a ballad about her ordeal, sung to the tune of Richard Cœur de Lion.[50] The first two stanzas are as follows:[51]

Une jeune innocente
Languissait dans les fers,
Seule dans l'univers,
Contre une main puissante ;
Gens indiscrets, d'accord entr'eux,
Ont supposé crimes affreux :
Poison, vol domestique,
Crioient ses ennemis :
Pauvre fille rustique
Les aurais-tu commis ?

Victoire est ingénue,
Dans son œil vif et noir
Il est aisé de voir
Son âme toute nue ;
Son langage est comme son cœur,
Simple, naïf, plein de candeur :
Sa naissance est commune ;
Victoire, en rougis-tu ?
Non; vertu sans fortune,
Vaut mieux qu'or sans vertu.
An innocent young girl
Languished in chains,
Alone in the world,
Against a powerful hand;
Indiscreet people, agreeing together,
Suspected horrible crimes:
Poison, domestic theft,
Cried her enemies:
Poor country girl
Would you have committed them?

Victoire is innocent,
In her bright black eye
It is easy to see
Her soul laid bare;
Her speech is like her heart,
Simple, naive, full of candor:
Her birth is common;
Victoire, are you embarrassed by it?
No; virtue without fortune,
Is better than gold without virtue.

Marriage

edit
Marriage announcement for Marie Salmon and "Mr. Savari"
Marriage announcement of Marie Salmon and "Mr. Savari" (Savary). One of her lawyers stands behind her, wearing his court dress.

On 26 August 1786, a few months after she was exonerated, Salmon married a 28-year-old infantry soldier from Lorraine named Jean-Louis Savary at the Church of Saint Severin in Paris.[52] The wedding ceremony was so popular, with people climbing onto the pews and railings, that soldiers were called to manage the crowds.[53]

The marriage was arranged by Madame de Genlis, because she remembered that Lecauchois had previously helped exonerate Savary[54] after he had been accused of kidnapping and theft several years earlier.[55] Both Salmon and Savary consented to the marriage.[56]

The House of Orléans provided the carriage that drove Salmon to the church for the ceremony,[53] and the Duchess of Orléans gifted the newlyweds a trousseau of eight or nine thousand livres.[57] Savary was also given a post at one of the castles of the Duke of Orléans.[58]

Death

edit

Salmon died on 2 May 1827 at the age of 67, surrounded by her family.[59] Her husband had died several years earlier in 1813.[60]

Legacy

edit
Allegorical illustration of a procession of citizens carrying a coffin and celebrating the end of the "Lord of Abuses"
Allegorical illustration of a procession of citizens carrying a coffin and celebrating the end of the "Lord of Abuses" in 1789

Salmon's wrongful conviction, in which she was nearly tortured and burned at the stake for a crime she did not commit, became a symbol of the harsh criminal justice system of the ancien régime.[61] Despite calls to meaningfully reform this system, many reforms prior to the French Revolution were "mostly symbolically charged measures... that cost little, politically, but looked good."[62]

One allegorical engraving by Jean Marie Mixelle [fr] and Sergent-Marceau dated 4 May 1789 shows the statesman Jacques Necker in a procession of citizens from all corners of French society, celebrating the death of the "Lord of Abuses" and carrying a coffin with symbols of each of the three estates on top.[63] Leading the procession are famous victims of injustice, identified by their names written on their backs. Salmon is identifiable by "M. F. Salmon" written on her back, and she is drawn walking beside Jean Calas,[63] who was tortured and executed on the wheel in 1762.[64] Necker had abolished the practice of torturing the accused for confessions in 1780.[62] The practice of torturing the convicted for the names of accomplices, which would have been Salmon's fate were it not for the intervention of her lawyers, was abolished in 1788.[62]

Mixelle and Sergent-Marceau's engraving is dated the day before the last Estates General of the Kingdom of France was called on 5 May 1789. At the conclusion of the final Estates General of 1789, the National Assembly was formed, and the French Revolution began.[65]

Notes

edit
  1. 1 2 3 Marie Salmon's birth year is contradicted across several sources, sometimes appearing as 1756 based on baptismal records with the Archives départementales de la Manche[66] or as 1763.[3] However, her lawyer Pierre Noël Lecauchois stated that she was born in 1760 in the opening of his legal brief, Justification de Marie-François Victoire Salmon.[1]
  2. Cagliostro went to London but was "ultimately outwitted by some English lawyers," which landed him in Fleet Prison. After he was freed, he travelled to Rome and was arrested again in 1789, and he remained in prison until his death in 1795.[47]

References

edit

Citations

edit
  1. Lecauchois 1786, p. 1, MÉMOIRE JUSTICATIF.
  2. Lecauchois 1786, p. 35.
  3. 1 2 3 Lüsebrink 1993, p. 94.
  4. 1 2 Lüsebrink 1993, p. 94; Maza 1993, p. 227.
  5. Maza 1998, p. 184.
  6. Lecauchois 1786, pp. 37–38.
  7. Lecauchois 1786, p. 39.
  8. Lecauchois 1786, p. 40.
  9. Lecauchois 1786, pp. 40–41.
  10. 1 2 3 Archives de Calvados.
  11. Lecauchois 1786, pp. 42–43.
  12. Lecauchois 1786, pp. 43–44.
  13. Lecauchois 1786, p. 45.
  14. Lecauchois 1786, p. 47.
  15. Lecauchois 1786, p. 48.
  16. Zaccone 1878, p. 145.
  17. 1 2 Maza 1998, p. 185.
  18. 1 2 Lebreton 1858, p. 352.
  19. 1 2 Maza 1993, p. 224.
  20. 1 2 Lüsebrink 1993, p. 95.
  21. Lüsebrink 1993, p. 95; Maza 1993, p. 224.
  22. Lebreton 1858, p. 352; Lüsebrink 1993, p. 95; Maza 1993, p. 224.
  23. Lecauchois 1786, Front cover; Fournel 1786, Front cover.
  24. Maza 1993, p. 233.
  25. Lüsebrink 1993, p. 93; Maza 1993, p. 226.
  26. Maza 1993, p. 226.
  27. Maza 1993, p. 227.
  28. Binet 1786.
  29. Lüsebrink 1993, p. 94; Maza 1993, pp. 231–232.
  30. Lüsebrink 1993, p. 94; Archives de Calvados.
  31. 1 2 Fournel 1786, p. 4.
  32. 1 2 Maza 1993, p. 231.
  33. Lecauchois 1786, pp. 35, 47–49.
  34. Maza 1993, p. 232.
  35. Lecauchois 1786, p. 111.
  36. Lecauchois 1786, p. 112.
  37. 1 2 Lüsebrink 1993, p. 96.
  38. Hardy, p. 151, 23 May 1786.
  39. Hardy, p. 152, 23 May 1786.
  40. Lüsebrink 1993, pp. 97–98; Maza 1993, p. 257.
  41. 1 2 3 Lüsebrink 1993, p. 97.
  42. 1 2 3 Hardy, p. 155, 26 May 1786.
  43. Lüsebrink 1993, p. 98.
  44. Lüsebrink 1993, p. 98; Hardy, p. 176, 8 June 1786.
  45. Hardy, p. 174, 8 June 1786.
  46. 1 2 Hardy, p. 176, 8 June 1786.
  47. 1 2 Chisholm (Cagliostro, Alessandro, Count) 1911, p. 946.
  48. Hardy, p. 173, 8 June 1786.
  49. 1 2 Journal encyclopédique 1786, p. 139.
  50. Lüsebrink 1993, p. 97; L'Année littéraire 1786, p 586 (original page 158).
  51. L'Année littéraire 1786, p 586 (original pages 158–161).
  52. Lüsebrink 1993, p. 98; BHVP manuscript; Hardy, p. 225, 26 August 1786.
  53. 1 2 Hardy, p. 226, 26 August 1786.
  54. Lüsebrink 1993, p. 98; Le Corbeiller 1927, p. 202.
  55. Le Corbeiller 1927, pp. 92–93.
  56. Le Corbeiller 1927, p. 202.
  57. Hardy, p. 227, 26 August 1786.
  58. Hardy, p. 226, 26 August 1786; Le Corbeiller 1927, p. 202.
  59. Le Corbeiller 1927, p. 225.
  60. Le Corbeiller 1927, p. 219.
  61. Maza 1998, p. 190; Mixelle, 4 May 1789.
  62. 1 2 3 Maza 1993, p. 213.
  63. 1 2 Mixelle, 4 May 1789.
  64. Chisholm (Calas, Jean) 1911, p. 967.
  65. Chateau Versailles 2018.
  66. Didac'doc 2015, p. 3.

Bibliography

edit
edit

Wikimedia Commons logo Media related to Marie Salmon at Wikimedia Commons

Original manuscripts

edit
  • Photographs of court manuscripts from 1782 and 1786, including the original judgement against Marie Salmon, written in French script, and provided by Les Archives de Calvados with the archival identifier F/6378

Further reading

edit