Mabry v. Johnson, 467 U.S. 504 (1984), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that accepting a first plea bargain that is later rescinded does not create a right to have that first bargain specifically enforced when the criminal defendant accepts a second, less-beneficial plea bargain.[1][2]

Mabry v. Johnson
Decided June 11, 1984
Full case nameMabry v. Johnson
Citations467 U.S. 504 (more)
Holding
Accepting a first plea bargain that is later rescinded does not create a right to have that first bargain specifically enforced when the criminal defendant accepts a second, less-beneficial plea bargain.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Case opinion
MajorityStevens, joined by unanimous

Background

edit

After Johnson was convicted in an Arkansas state court on charges of burglary, assault, and murder, the Arkansas Supreme Court set aside the murder conviction, and plea negotiations ensued. A deputy prosecutor proposed to Johnson's attorney that, in exchange for a guilty plea to a charge of accessory after a felony murder, the prosecutor would recommend a 21-year sentence to be served concurrently with the concurrent burglary and assault sentences. However, when defense counsel called the prosecutor three days later and communicated respondent's acceptance of the offer, the prosecutor told counsel that a mistake had been made, and withdrew the offer.[1]

The prosecutor proposed instead that, in exchange for a guilty plea, he would recommend a 21-year sentence to be served consecutively to the other sentences. Respondent rejected the new offer, but after a mistrial was declared, he ultimately accepted the prosecutor's second offer, and the trial judge imposed a 21-year sentence to be served consecutively to the previous sentences.[1]

After exhausting state remedies, Johnson sought habeas corpus relief in a federal district court with respect to his guilty plea. The court dismissed the petition, holding that respondent had understood the consequences of his guilty plea, that he had received effective assistance of counsel, and that, because it was not established that he had detrimentally relied on the prosecutor's first-proposed plea agreement, Johnson had no right to enforce it. However, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, holding that "fairness" precluded the prosecution's withdrawal of the plea proposal once accepted by respondent.[1]

Opinion of the court

edit

The Supreme Court issued an opinion on June 11, 1984.[1]

Subsequent developments

edit

References

edit
  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Mabry v. Johnson, 467 U.S. 504 (1984).
  2. Lieberman, Jethro K. (1999). "Guilty Plea". A Practical Companion to the Constitution. p. 219.
edit

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.