Draft talk:Chris DeRosa

Resubmission note

Added independent sources (Modern Drummer, The New York Times, and China Daily) to demonstrate notability per WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Requesting new review. DrumsForFun (talk) 08:53, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Request for re-review

Hello reviewers,  

I've updated this draft with additional reliable, independent sources — including national media (The New York Times, China Daily), major music publications (Modern Drummer, DRUM!), educational affiliations (NYU, Marymount Manhattan College), and chart documentation (World Indie Music Chart).  

The article now meets notability and sourcing guidelines for musicians (WP:MUSICBIO, WP:GNG).  

Requesting a new review for publication.  

Thank you for your time and consideration!  

~ DrumsForFun DrumsForFun (talk) 18:35, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Request for re-review

Hi @User:Timtrent, I've updated the draft to include independent secondary sources (Modern Drummer, DRUM!, The New York Times, China Daily, etc.), added publication details, and removed any promotional tone. Could you please take another look at Draft:Chris DeRosa? Thank you for your time and help! — ~~~~ DrumsForFun (talk) 23:25, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

@DrumsForFun I almost never rereview drafts. You get a better outcome from fresh eyes. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:00, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Request for new review

Hi, I've manually rewritten the entire Draft:Chris DeRosa article from verified, independent published sources (Modern Drummer, DRUM!, The New York Times, China Daily, The Black Page Drum Magazine, Hudson Music, All About Jazz, etc.). The previous concerns about AI-generated tone have been addressed. This version was written manually with direct reference to the cited sources and verifiable documentation.

Could an editor please take a fresh look at the new draft version? Thank you for your time and help!  

— ~~~~ DrumsForFun (talk) 19:22, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Chris DeRosa article

Thanks for the review. I’ve gone through the draft and removed anything that could appear promotional, vague, or essay-like. I’ve also rewritten sections to ensure they are paraphrased directly from published, reliable sources and not generated by any automated tool. All statements are now tied to verifiable citations. If there are specific sentences that still raise concerns, please let me know and I’ll revise them immediately. DrumsForFun (talk) 00:35, 2 December 2025 (UTC)