Draft talk:Center for Creative Leadership

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization

Business

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business

Education

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation

Disclosure

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am editing this draft as a paid editor acting on behalf of the Center for Creative Leadership.

Employer: Acronym Media, Inc.

Client: Center for Creative Leadership (CCL)

~~~~ Namekal (talk) 03:44, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Clarification on AfC feedback (notability and tone)

Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@Eyesnore: Hi — thank you for reviewing the draft and for the clear feedback.

As I work on revisions, I want to make sure I’m addressing your concerns in the way AfC expects, rather than guessing at intent. If you’re able, I’d appreciate brief clarification on two points:

On tone: could you point to one or two specific passages or sections that read as advocacy-oriented, so I can revise or remove them appropriately?
On notability: can you clarify if the concern is primarily that the draft relies too heavily on sources about CCL’s programs or ideas (rather than CCL itself)?

I realize you probably have many drafts to review (and are not obligated to provide detailed guidance), so I appreciate any feedback you have to offer. Even a high-level confirmation will be helpful as I prepare a resubmission.

Thanks again for taking the time to review.

Namekal (talk) 19:24, 29 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Some of the text of your draft article is promotional in tone. It should be rewritten to be neutral and encyclopedic. In addition, you need citations to secondary sources to prove it has widespread third-party coverage. It's not quite ready yet to be in the main article space, so it needs work. Eyesnore ^talk💬 19:52, 29 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Add topic