Draft talk:Cauan Baptistella
Latest comment: 4 months ago by SunloungerFrog in topic Article should be in draft space after AfD
 | This draft was nominated for deletion on 26 January 2026. The result of the discussion was Draftify. |
| This draft must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the draft and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this draft, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article should be in draft space after AfD
edit@GB fan, I see that you restored this article from draftspace, stating that @Thilio's draftify was incorrect because the article was over 90 days old. In fact, the consensus at AfD (see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cauan_Baptistella) was to draftify. Please will you revert your restoration? Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 22:53, 2 February 2026 (UTC)