Draft talk:Alice Duport-Percier
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Tonymetz in topic Clarity on Source Quality Expectations
| This draft must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the draft and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this draft, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
Clarity on Source Quality Expectations
edit@Boynamedsue could you provide more specifics on why this was bumped to drafts? You had mentioned "lack of sources", and having more clarity would help. Tonymetz 💬 17:41, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Tony, thanks for getting in touch. The problem with sourcing is that the sources seem to all be her employers or her personal website. We need independent sources to verify her notability per WP:GNG. Two sources with two paragraphs each would probably be enough for me to approve it.Boynamedsue (talk) 18:18, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
- thank you for clarifying. I made some improvements to the sources now that the subject has received more independent coverage from WP:GNG
- Would you be able to help restore it to WP:MAINSPACE Tonymetz 💬 00:51, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Tony, thanks for getting in touch. The problem with sourcing is that the sources seem to all be her employers or her personal website. We need independent sources to verify her notability per WP:GNG. Two sources with two paragraphs each would probably be enough for me to approve it.Boynamedsue (talk) 18:18, 31 March 2026 (UTC)